Purpose: To evaluate the role of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the examination of multiple
myeloma (MM) patients with bone-marrow transplants. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 MR examinations were made of 20 patients: 33 examinations of the spine
and pelvis in 20/20 patients; and 7 examinations of the femora in 5/20 patients. The
40 examinations were evaluated and the results compared with those found at radiography.
Altogether 13/20 pa- tients were re-examined: 10 after 1 year (one patient twice);
and three after 2 years. Five sequences were tested, three of them first without and
then with i.v. contrast enhancement. Results: In 24/33 exami nations, active MM lesions were shown by MR. In 16/33 examinations,
MR showed greater spread and detectability than radiography. In the 5/20 femoral patients,
three had a peripheral red bone-marrow extension in the femora. In the 13 re-examinations,
the lesions had spread in four patients, were unchanged in seven, and had decreased
in two. The lesions were easier to detect with the turbo inversion recovery (TIR)
technique and with fat saturation than with the conventional spin-echo sequences.
Contrast enhancement made the lesions more conspicuous in 8/17 examinations. Conclusions: MR has the potential to be a useful routine examination with T1-weighted and TIR
sequences of selected areas, and without the use of contrast enhancement. However,
further longitudinal studies are necessary in order to evaluate its possible predictive
value.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Clinical ImagingAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Publication history
Acta Radiol 1998;39:36–42
Identification
Copyright
© 1998 Published by Elsevier Inc.