Advertisement
Patients & Practice, Policy & Education| Volume 98, P59-60, June 2023

Download started.

Ok

The role of the radiologist in patient care following Dobbs v. Jackson

      Highlights

      • Decision making in healthcare has become more complicated in the setting of abortion bans
      • Maternal and fetal health outcomes are suffering in states with abortion bans
      • Radiologists will be involved in complicated multidisciplinary care for pregnant patients who have both obstetrical and non-obstetrical imaging needs.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Cates W.
        • Grimes D.A.
        • Schulz K.F.
        The public health impact of legal abortion: 30 years later.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003; 35: 25-28
        • Harper L.M.
        • Leach J.M.
        • Robbins L.
        • Blanchard C.
        • Metz T.D.
        • Mazzoni S.
        • et al.
        All-cause mortality in reproductive-aged females by state: an analysis of the effects of abortion legislation.
        Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2023; 141: 236-242
        • Nambiar A.
        • Patel S.
        • Santiago-Munoz P.
        • Spong C.Y.
        • Nelson D.B.
        Maternal morbidity and fetal outcomes among pregnant women at 22 weeks’ gestation or less with complications in 2 Texas hospitals after legislation on abortion.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 227: 648-650.e1
        • Arey W.
        • Lerma K.
        • Beasley A.
        • Harper L.
        • Moayedi G.
        • White K.
        A preview of the dangerous future of abortion bans - Texas senate bill 8.
        N Engl J Med. 2022; 387: 388-390
      1. Characteristics of US abortion patients in 2014 and changes since 2008.
        Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2016; ([cited January 14, 2023])
        • Myers C.K.
        Measuring the burden: The effect of travel distance on abortions and births.
        in: IZA Discussion Paper No 14556. 2021
        • Jha P.
        • Pōder L.
        • Glanc P.
        • Patel-Lippmann K.
        • McGettigan M.
        • Moshiri M.
        • et al.
        Imaging cancer in pregnancy.
        Radiographics. 2022; 42: 1494-1513
      2. Challenges in interventional radiology: the pregnant patient.
        in: Moon E.K. Wang W. Newman J.S. MDP Bayona-Molano Seminars in Interventional Radiology. Thieme Medical Publishers, 2013
        • Henkel A.
        • Beshar I.
        • Cahill E.P.
        • Blumenfeld Y.J.
        • Chueh J.
        • Shaw K.A
        Impact of a potential 20-week abortion ban on likelihood of completing required views in second-trimester fetal anatomy ultrasound.
        Am J Perinatol. 2022; (Online ahead of print)
        • Farmakis S.G.
        • Chertoff J.D.
        • Barth R.A.
        Pediatric radiologist workforce shortage: action steps to resolve.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2021; 18: 1675-1677
        • ACR
        Statement on Recent Events: The Patient-Doctor Relationship Must Be Preserved.
        ([press release])2022 (June 27, 2022)