Breast Imaging| Volume 96, P38-43, April 2023

Download started.

Ok

Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging of breast cancers and its correlation with biological status

Published:February 08, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2023.02.002

      Highlights

      • APT imaging is a usefulness method without the need for contrast enhancement.
      • Triple negative and high-Ki-67 breast cancers show high APT signal intensity.
      • APT imaging helps clinicians to assess biological status of breast cancers.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To assess the usefulness of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging to predict the biological status of breast cancers.

      Method

      Sixty-six patients (age range 31–85 years, mean 58.9 years) with histopathologically proven invasive ductal carcinomas of 2 cm or larger in diameter were included in this study. 3D APT weighted imaging was conducted on a 3 T scanner. Mean APT signal intensity (SI) was analyzed in relation to biological subtypes, Ki-67 labeling index, and nuclear grades (NGs).

      Results

      The triple-negative (TN) cancers (n = 10; 2.75 ± 0.42%) showed significantly higher APT SI than the luminal type cancers (n = 48; 1.74 ± 0.83) and HER2 cancers (n = 8; 1.83 ± 0.21) (P = 0.0007, 0.03). APT SI had weakly positive correlation with the Ki-67 labeling index (r = 0.38, P = 0.002). The mean APT SIs were significantly higher for high-Ki-67 (>30%) (n = 31; 2.25 ± 0.70) than low-Ki-67 (≤30%) cancers (n = 35; 1.60 ± 0.79) (P = 0.0007). There was no significant difference in the APT SIs between NG 1–2 (n = 31; 1.71 ± 0.84) and NG 3 (n = 35; 2.08 ± 0.76%) cancers (P = 0.06).

      Conclusions

      TN and high-Ki-67 breast cancers showed high APT SIs. APT imaging can help to predict the biological status of breast cancers.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Iima M.
        • Kataoka M.
        • Kanao S.
        • et al.
        Intravoxel incoherent motion and quantitative non-gaussian diffusion MR imaging: evaluation of the diagnostic and prognostic value of several markers of malignant and benign breast lesions.
        Radiology. 2018; 287: 432-441
        • Goldhirsch A.
        • Wood W.C.
        • Coates A.S.
        Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011.
        Ann Oncol. 2011; 22: 1736-1747
        • Waks A.G.
        • Winer E.P.
        Breast cancer treatment: a review.
        JAMA. 2019; 321: 288-300
        • Borri F.
        • Granaglia A.
        Pathology of triple negative breast cancer.
        Semin Cancer Biol. 2012; 72: 136-145
        • Kalvala J.
        • Parks R.M.
        • Green A.R.
        • et al.
        Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical excision specimens for Ki-67 in breast cancer - a systematic review of the literature.
        Histopathology. 2022; 80: 468-484
        • Togao O.
        • Yoshiura T.
        • Keupp J.
        • et al.
        Amide proton transfer imaging of adult diffuse gliomas: correlation with histopathological grades.
        Neuro Oncol. 2014; 16: 441-448
        • Kamitani T.
        • Sagiyama K.
        • Togao O.
        • et al.
        Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging of parotid tumors: differentiation of malignant and benign tumors.
        Eur J Radiol. 2020; 129109047
        • Zhou J.
        • Blakeley J.O.
        • Hua J.
        • et al.
        Practical data acquisition method for human brain tumor amide proton transfer (APT) imaging.
        Magn Reson Med. 2008; 60: 842-849
        • Takayama Y.
        • Nishie A.
        • Sugimoto M.
        • et al.
        Amide proton transfer (APT) magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison with Gleason scores.
        MAGMA. 2016; 29: 671-679
        • Takayama Y.
        • Nishie A.
        • Togao O.
        • et al.
        Amide proton transfer MR imaging of endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma: association with histologic grade.
        Radiology. 2018; 286: 909-917
        • Nishie A.
        • Takayama Y.
        • Asayama Y.
        • et al.
        Amide proton transfer imaging can predict tumor grade in rectal cancer.
        Magn Reson Imaging. 2018; 51: 96-103
        • Ohno Y.
        • Yui M.
        • Koyama H.
        • et al.
        Chemical exchange saturation transfer MR imaging: preliminary results for differentiation of malignant and benign thoracic lesions.
        Radiology. 2016; 279: 578-589
        • Allison K.H.
        • Hammond M.E.H.
        • Dowsett M.
        • et al.
        Estrogen and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer: ASCO/CAP guideline update.
        J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38: 1346-1366
        • Nielsen T.O.
        • Leung S.C.Y.
        • Rimm D.L.
        • et al.
        Assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer: updated recommendations from the international Ki67 in breast cancer working group.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021; 113: 808-819
        • Tsuda H.
        • Akiyama F.
        • Kurosumi M.
        • et al.
        Establishment of histological criteria for high-risk node-negative breast carcinoma for a multi-institutional randomized clinical trial of adjuvant therapy.
        Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998; 28: 486-491
        • Sakamoto G.
        • Inaji H.
        • Akiyama F.
        General rules for clinical and pathological recording of breast cancer 2005.
        Breast Cancer. 2005; : S1-S27
        • Togao O.
        • Keupp J.
        • Hiwatashi A.
        • et al.
        Amide proton transfer imaging of brain tumors using a self-corrected 3D fast spin-echo dixon method: comparison with separate B0 correction.
        Magn Reson Med. 2017; 77: 2272-2279
        • Zhang S.
        • Seilar S.
        • Wang X.
        • et al.
        CEST-Dixon for human breast lesion characterization at 3T: a preliminary study.
        Magn Reson Med. 2018; 80: 895-903
        • Zaric O.
        • Farr A.
        • Rodriguez E.P.
        • et al.
        7T CEST MRI: a potential imaging tool for the assessment of tumor grade and cell proliferation in breast cancer.
        Magn Reson Imaging. 2019; 59: 77-87
        • Loi L.
        • Zimmermann F.
        • Goerke S.
        • et al.
        Relaxation-compensated CEST (chemical exchange saturation transfer) imaging in breast cancer diagnostics at 7T.
        Eur J Radiol. 2020; 129109068
        • Sagiyama K.
        • Mashimo T.
        • Togao O.
        • et al.
        In vivo chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging allows early detection of a therapeutic response in glioblastioma.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111: 4542-4547
        • Silva J.L.
        • Nunes N.C.C.
        • Izetti P.
        • et al.
        Triple negative breast cancer: a thorough review of biomarkers.
        Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020; 145102855
        • Bonzanini M.
        • Morelli L.
        • Bonandini E.M.
        • et al.
        Cytologic features of triple-negative breast carcinoma.
        Cancer Cytopathol. 2021; 120: 401-409
        • Borri F.
        • Granaglia A.
        Pathology of triple negative breast cancer.
        Semin Cancer Biol. 2021; 72: 136-145
        • Kala C.
        • Athar M.
        • Kala S.
        • et al.
        Clinical and cyto-morphological characterization of triple negative breast cancer.
        J Cytol. 2019; 36: 84-88
        • Kamitani T.
        • Matsuo Y.
        • Yabuuchi H.
        • et al.
        Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient values and prognostic factors of breast cancer.
        Magn Reson Med Sci. 2013; 12: 193-199