Advertisement
Pediatric Radiology| Volume 95, P74-79, March 2023

Download started.

Ok

Detection of anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) by echocardiogram: When does computed tomographic angiography add value?

      Highlights

      • TTE can reliably identify or suspect the presence of AAOCA in expert hands.
      • Advanced imaging with CCTA is crucial for further detailed anatomic definition of the anomalous origin and course.
      • CCTA findings might have major implications on clinical decision-making.

      Abstract

      Background and objective

      There is limited literature comparing TTE and CCTA in children with suspected AAOCA. To determine the distribution of various coronary anomalies comparing TTE and CCTA data, and define the added value advanced imaging brings in clinical decision-making.

      Materials and methods

      Retrospective review of data was obtained in patients aged 0–18 years who underwent TTE and CCTA for suspected AAOCA. Patient demographics, CCTA and TTE findings, and interventions performed were recorded.

      Results

      100 consecutive patients were included (60% male), mean age 11 years (7 days-18 years old). In 93 patients, CCTA detected 94 anomalous coronaries. Definitive coronary abnormality was reported on TTE in 77 patients; 76 of which were confirmed by CCTA, 1 patient was found to have a normal variant. Suspected anomalous origin was reported in 16 patients on TTE, 13 of which were abnormal on CCTA. The coronary origin was not seen on TTE in 6 patients; of these, 3 had AAOCA on CCTA and 3 had hypoplastic RCA with left dominant system. Only 1 patient who had a normal TTE was found to have AAOCA on CCTA.
      CCTA was better than TTE in defining ostial characteristics and the course of the anomalous coronary artery, and detecting myocardial bridge.

      Conclusions

      CCTA adds value in diagnosing AAOCA when the coronary origins are not well assessed or suspected anomalous origin is suggested on TTE. In addition, when a confident definitive diagnosis of AAOCA is reported on TTE, CCTA demonstrates better performance in determining additional features of AAOCA.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Maron B.J.
        • Doerer J.J.
        • Haas T.S.
        • Tierney D.M.
        • Mueller F.O.
        Sudden deaths in young competitive athletes: analysis of 1866 deaths in the United States, 1980–2006.
        Circulation. 2009; 119: 1085-1092https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.804617
        • Halabchi F.
        • Seif-Barghi T.
        • Mazaheri R.
        Sudden cardiac death in young athletes; a literature review and special considerations in Asia.
        Asian J Sports Med. 2011; 2: 1-15https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.34818
        • Yuksel S.
        • Meric M.
        • Soylu K.
        • et al.
        The primary anomalies of coronary artery origin and course: a coronary angiographic analysis of 16,573 patients.
        Exp Clin Cardiol. 2013; 18: 121-123
        • Prakken N.H.
        • Cramer M.J.
        • Olimulder M.A.
        • Agostoni P.
        • Mali W.P.
        • Velthuis B.K.
        Screening for proximal coronary artery anomalies with 3-dimensional MR coronary angiography.
        Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010; 26: 701-710https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-010-9617-0
        • Molossi S.
        • Agrawal H.
        • Mery C.M.
        • et al.
        Outcomes in anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery following a prospective standardized approach.
        Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13e008445https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008445
        • Lorber R.
        • Srivastava S.
        • Wilder T.J.
        • et al.
        Anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries in the young: echocardiographic evaluation with surgical correlation [published correction appears in JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Feb;9(2):217].
        JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8: 1239-1249https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.04.027
        • Bianco F.
        • Colaneri M.
        • Bucciarelli V.
        • et al.
        Echocardiographic screening for the anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries.
        Open Heart. 2021; 8e001495https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2020-001495
        • Turner I.I.
        • Turek J.W.
        • Jaggers J.
        • Herlong J.R.
        • Lawson D.S.
        • Lodge A.J.
        Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery: preoperative diagnosis and surgical planning.
        World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2011; 2: 340-345https://doi.org/10.1177/2150135111406938
        • Molossi S.
        • Martínez-Bravo L.E.
        • Mery C.M.
        Anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery.
        Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2019; 15: 111-121https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj-15-2-111
        • Frommelt P.C.
        • Frommelt M.A.
        • Tweddell J.S.
        • Jaquiss R.D.
        Prospective echocardiographic diagnosis and surgical repair of anomalous origin of a coronary artery from the opposite sinus with an interarterial course.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42: 148-154https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00503-5
        • Yamanaka O.
        • Hobbs R.E.
        Coronary artery anomalies in 126,595 patients undergoing coronary arteriography.
        Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1990; 21: 28-40https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810210110
        • Rosenthal R.L.
        • Carrothers I.A.
        • Schussler J.M.
        Benign or malignant anomaly? Very high takeoff of the left main coronary artery above the left coronary sinus.
        Tex Heart Inst J. 2012; 39: 538-541
        • Cantinotti M.
        • Giordano R.
        • Assanta N.
        • et al.
        Echocardiographic screening of anomalous origin of coronary arteries in athletes with a focus on high take-off.
        Healthcare (Basel). 2021; 9: 231https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020231
        • Brothers J.A.
        • Frommelt M.A.
        • Jaquiss R.D.B.
        • Myerburg R.J.
        • Fraser Jr., C.D.
        • Tweddell J.S.
        Expert consensus guidelines: anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153: 1440-1457https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.066
        • Mery C.M.
        • De León L.E.
        • Molossi S.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of surgical intervention for anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery: a large contemporary prospective cohort study.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 155: 305-319.e4https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.08.116
        • Erol N.
        Challenges in evaluation and management of children with myocardial bridging [published online ahead of print, 2021 Feb 25].
        Cardiology. 2021; : 1-8https://doi.org/10.1159/000513900
        • Krishnamurthy R.
        • Masand P.M.
        • Jadhav S.P.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of computed tomography angiography and structured reporting of high-risk morphology in anomalous aortic origin of coronary artery: comparison with surgery.
        Pediatr Radiol. 2021; 51: 1299-1310https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05011-0