Advertisement

Index lesion detection in multifocal prostate cancer: Simplified PI-RADS biparametric MRI vs PI-RADS v2.1 multiparametric MRI

Published:December 07, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.11.013

      Highlights

      • Detection of index lesion (IL) by MRI is crucial to perform targeted biopsy, to monitor the progression of the PCa and to guide the focal therapy.
      • In prostate with multifocal lesions, the IL can be the smallest markedly hypointense lesion vs the largest with moderate hypointensity on ADC maps.
      • Sensitivity in the detection of IL was 79.6–83% and 93.2–94.9% with the PI-RADS v2.1 and S-PI-RADS criteria, respectively

      Abstract

      Objective

      To assess the diagnostic performance of simplified PI-RADS (S-PI-RADS) with biparametric MRI (bpMRI) vs PI-RADS v2.1 with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in identifying lesion index (IL) in patients with multifocal prostate cancer (PCa)., The inter- and intra-observer variability was also determined with two readers.

      Materials and methods

      Retrospective analysis of the prostate MRI of 59 patients with multifocal PCa (two or more tumors ascertained by TRUS/guided MRI targeted prostate biopsy). Two radiologists with experience in prostate MRI identified the IL in each patient according to S-PI-RADS-dedicated bpMRI. According to S-PI-RADS in multifocal intraprostatic lesions the IL was defined as the one with the greatest volume (when lesions with similar signal hypointensity on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps coexist), or as the lesion with marked hypointensity irrespective of volume (when lesions with moderate and marked signal hypointensity on ADC map coexist). Otherwise, according to PI-RADS v2.1 the IL is the one intraprostatic with the highest score.
      The agreement between the S-PI-RADS and PI-RADS v2.1 results and the histological data was expressed as a percentage of agreement or sensitivity (percentage of PCa or IL correctly identified on the total of PCas). The intra- and inter-observer agreement was evaluated with Cohen's kappa (k) coefficient.

      Results

      The 133 lesions identified were compared with the biopsy results. Sensitivity in the detection of IL was 79.6–83% and 93.2–94.9% with the PI-RADS v2.1 and S-PI-RADS criteria, respectively, whereas the specificity was 83.8–86.5& and 94.6–96%. With both observers, the overall diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher using S-PI-RADS.
      Concerning the S-PI-RADS, the concordance between IL and tumor index (PCa with the highest Gleason score) was found in 56/59 patients (93%) both in the peripheral and transition zone. In the detection of the IL the agreement between the two readers was moderate (k = 0.701) for the PI-RADS v2.1 and good (k = 0.844) for the S-PI-RADS. A poor agreement between the two readers 0.38 (95% CI: 0.0653 to 0.693) and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.123 to 0.696) was revealed.

      Conclusions

      In patients with multifocal PCa, S-PI-RADS-based bpMRI showed significantly higher performance in IL detection and good inter-observer agreement.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Siegel R.L.
        • Miller K.D.
        • Fuchs H.E.
        • Jemad A.
        Cancer statistics 2021.
        CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71: 7-33
        • Miller G.J.
        • Cygan J.M.
        Morphology of prostate cancer: the effects of multifocality on histological grade, tumor volume and capsule penetration.
        J Urol. 1994; 152: 1709-1713
        • Arora R.
        • Koch M.O.
        • Eble J.N.
        • Ulbright T.M.
        • Li L.
        • Cheng L.
        Heterogeneity of Gleason grade in multifocal adenocarcinoma of the prostate.
        Cancer. 2004; 100: 2362-2366
        • Huang C.C.
        • Deng F.M.
        • Kong M.X.
        • et al.
        Re-evaluating the concept of “dominant/index tumor nodule” in multifocal prostate cancer.
        Virchows Arch. 2014; 464: 589-594
        • McNeal J.E.
        • Price H.M.
        • Redwine E.A.
        • et al.
        Stage A versus stage B adenocarcinoma of the prostate: morphological comparison and biological significance.
        J Urol. 1988; 139: 61-65
        • Rosenkrantz A.B.
        • Deng F.M.
        • Kim S.
        • Lim R.P.
        • Hindman N.
        • Mussi T.C.
        • et al.
        Prostate cancer: multiparametric MRI for index lesion localization–a multiple-reader study.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199: 830-837
        • Rud E.
        • Klotz D.
        • Rennesund K.
        • et al.
        Detection of the index tumour and tumour volume in prostate cancer using T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone.
        BJU Int. 2014 Dec; 114: E32-E42
        • Turkbey B.
        • Rosenkrantz A.B.
        • Haider M.A.
        • et al.
        Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.
        Eur Urol. 2019 Sep; 76: 340-351
        • Schoots I.G.
        • Barentsz J.O.
        • Bittencourt L.K.
        • et al.
        PI-RADS Committee position on MRI without contrast medium in biopsy-naive men with suspected prostate cancer: narrative review.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jan; 216: 3-19
        • Scialpi M.
        • D'Andrea A.
        • Martorana E.
        • et al.
        Biparametric MRI of the prostate [published correction appears in Turk J Urol. 2018 Jan;44(1):91].
        Turk J Urol. 2017; 43: 401-409
        • Scialpi M.
        • Aisa M.C.
        • D'Andrea A.
        • Martorana E.
        Simplified prostate imaging reporting and data system for biparametric prostate MRI: a proposal.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Aug; 211: 379-382
        • Scialpi M.
        • Martorana E.
        • Scialpi P.
        • et al.
        Round table: arguments in supporting abbreviated or biparametric MRI of the prostate protocol.
        Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec; 45: 3974-3981
        • Scialpi M.
        Simplified PI-RADS-based biparametric MRI: a rationale for detecting and managing prostate cancer.
        Clin Imaging. 2021 Dec; 80: 290-291
        • Scialpi M.
        • Scialpi P.
        • Martorana E.
        Prostate cancer index lesion detection and volume estimation: is dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI really reliable.
        AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. December 2019; 213
        • Tamada T.
        • Kido A.
        • Yamamoto A.
        • Takeuchi M.
        • Miyaji Y.
        • Moriya T.
        • Sone T.
        Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection with PI-RADS version 2.1.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jan; 53: 283-291
        • Xu L.
        • Zhang G.
        • Shi B.
        • Liu Y.
        • Zou T.
        • Yan W.
        • Xiao Y.
        • Xue H.
        • Feng F.
        • Lei J.
        • Jin Z.
        • Sun H.
        Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
        Cancer Imaging. 2019 Dec 21; 19: 90
        • Scialpi M.
        • Scialpi P.
        • Pusiol T.
        • D'andrea A.
        Biparametric MRI and 41 sector map for MRI/Transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy to increase diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer.
        Turk J Urol. 2018 Nov; 44: 453-454
        • Andreoiu M.
        • Cheng L.
        Multifocal prostate cancer: biologic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications.
        Hum Pathol. 2010 Jun; 41: 781-793
        • Martorana E.
        • Pirola G.M.
        • Scialpi M.
        • et al.
        Lesion volume predicts prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness: validation of its value alone and matched with prostate imaging reporting and data system score.
        BJU Int. 2017 Jul; 120: 92-103
        • Russo F.
        • Regge D.
        • Armando E.
        • et al.
        Detection of prostate cancer index lesions with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) using whole-mount histological sections as the reference standard.
        BJU Int. 2016; 118: 84-94
        • Goldman H.
        • Singh N.
        • Harding C.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect significant prostate cancer and index lesion location: accuracy of mpMRI.
        ANZ J Surg. 2019; 89: 106-110https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14754
        • van Leenders Geert J.L.H.
        • et al.
        The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2020; 44: e87-e99
        • Scialpi M.
        • Prosperi E.
        • D'Andrea A.
        • et al.
        Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI with non-endorectal coil at 3T in the detection and localization of prostate cancer.
        Anticancer Res. 2017; 37: 1263-1271
        • Woo S.
        • Suh C.H.
        • Kim S.Y.
        • Cho J.Y.
        • Kim S.H.
        • Moon M.H.
        Head-to-head comparison between biparametric and multiparametric MRI for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2018; 211: 226-241
        • Kuhl C.K.
        • Bruhn R.
        • Kramer N.
        • Nebelung S.
        • Heidenreich A.
        • Schrading S.
        Abbreviated biparametric prostate MR imaging in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen.
        Radiology. 2017; 285: 493-505
        • Kang Z.
        • Min X.
        • Weinreb J.
        • et al.
        Abbreviated biparametric versus standard multiparametric MRI for diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019; : 357-365
        • Scialpi M.
        • Scialpi P.
        • Martorana E.
        • et al.
        Simplified PI-RADS (S-PI-RADS) for biparametric MRI to detect and manage prostate cancer: what urologists need to know.
        Turk J Urol. 2021; 47: 175-182
        • Gleason D.F.
        Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective.
        Hum Pathol. 1992; 23: 273-279