Highlights
- •It is possible to classify the silicone implant fibrous capsules by MRI.
- •The results assume that the changes in the fibrous capsules are chronic-evolutionary.
- •The proposed classification has good interobserver agreement.
- •The fibrous capsule graduation by MRI directly impacts patient management and follow-up.
Abstract
Objective
To propose a new classification system for evaluating fibrous capsules around silicone
implants using magnetic resonance.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated 90 consecutive patients who underwent breast MRI scans
at a single center from February to March 2022. All patients with silicone implants
and contrast dynamic sequences were included. Two radiologists classified the fibrous
capsules according to the proposed classification in four grades. Interobserver variability
was calculated for the final score. For comparison purposes, the inter-rater agreement
of background parenchymal enhancement and the amount of fibroglandular tissue were
also calculated.
Results
Reader 1 classified 2 (2.2) fibrous capsules as grade 1, 7 (7.8) as grade 2, 18 (20.0)
as grade 3, and 63 (70.0) as grade 4, whereas reader 2 classified 1 (1.1), 9 (10.0),
24 (26.7), and 56 (62.2) fibrous capsules, respectively, for each grade. The interobserver
agreement for fibrous capsule classification was moderate (ĸ = 0.65). The inter-rater
agreement of background parenchymal enhancement and amount of fibroglandular tissue
were fair: ĸ = 0.50 and ĸ = 0.44, respectively.
Conclusion
Our study proposes classifying FC by MRI in patients with SI to standardize the description
and classification of the findings with good interobserver agreement.
Abbreviations:
SI (Silicone implants), MRI (Magnetic resonance imaging), FDA (Food and Drug Administration), BI-RADS (Breast imaging-reporting and data system), SIGBIC (Silicone-induced granuloma of breast implant capsules), FC (Fibrous capsules), PD (Proton density), BIA-ALCL (Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma)Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Clinical ImagingAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Classification of capsular contracture after prosthetic breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Oct; 96 (discussion 1124. PMID: 7568488): 1119-1123
- The baker classification for capsular contracture in breast implant surgery is unreliable as a diagnostic tool.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Nov; 146 (PMID: 32852468): 956-962https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007238
- Discussion: the baker classification for capsular contracture in breast implant surgery is unreliable as a diagnostic tool.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Nov; 146 (PMID: 33136938): 963https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007312
- Particulate debris released from breast implant surfaces is highly dependent on implant type.Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Jun 14; 41 (NP782-NP793) (PMID: 33564817)https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab051
- Assessment of silicone particle migration among women undergoing removal or revision of silicone breast implants in the Netherlands.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1; 4 (PMID: 34542618)e2125381https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25381
- Breast implants - certain labeling recommendations to improve patient communication - guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (fda.gov).https://www.fda.gov/media/131885/downloadDate accessed: September 25, 2021
- ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas.5th ed. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA2003 (American College of Radiology, “ACR BI-RADS® - Magnetic Resonance”)
blinded.
blinded.
blinded.
- Breast augmentation market by product (silicone breast implant, saline breast implant), shape (anatomical, round), surface (smooth, textured), procedure (inframammary fold, trans-axillary), end user, and region - global forecast to 2025.https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/breast-augmentation-market-239683866.htmlDate accessed: September 25, 2021
- Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and the textured breast implant crisis.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Feb; 44 (Epub 2019 Oct 17. Erratum in: Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Oct;44(5):1951. PMID: 31624894): 1-12https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01521-3
- 2019 NCCN consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL).Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Jan 31; 39https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy331
- Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI: a comprehensive review.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020; 51: 43-61https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26762
- Inter- and intra-observer agreement of BI-RADS-based subjective visual estimation of amount of fibroglandular breast tissue with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison to automated quantitative assessment.Eur Radiol. 2016; 26: 3917-3922https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4274-x
blinded.
blinded.
blinded.
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: August 15, 2022
Accepted:
August 9,
2022
Received in revised form:
August 8,
2022
Received:
May 9,
2022
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
