Advertisement

Dispelling myths: The case for women in radiology and radiation oncology

Published:February 22, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.02.008

      Abstract

      Common misconceptions about radiology and radiation oncology exist and may dissuade women from pursuing these specialties. The American Association for Women in Radiology (AAWR) Medical Student Outreach Subcommittee began a multi-year social media campaign aimed at addressing these myths. Here, we outline several myths presented in this social media campaign and provide a combination of literature review and experts' opinions to deconstruct and dispel them.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Colleges AAoM
        2019 fall applicant, matriculant, and enrollment data tables.
        • ACGME
        Residents and fellows by sex and specialty, 2019.
        • Angtuaco T.L.
        • Macura K.J.
        • Lewicki A.M.
        • Rosado-de-Christenson M.L.
        • Rumack C.M.
        Radiologic history exhibit: the american Association for Women Radiologists (AAWR): 25 years of promoting women in radiology.
        Radiographics. 2008; 28: 573-582https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.282075132
        • Gunderman R.B.
        • Houk J.L.
        The importance of role models in increasing women in radiology.
        Acad Radiol. 2017; 24: 230-231https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.09.021
        • Roubidoux M.A.
        • Packer M.M.
        • Applegate K.E.
        • Aben G.
        Female medical students' interest in radiology careers.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2009; 6: 246-253https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2008.11.014
        • Sepulveda K.A.
        • Paladin A.M.
        • Rawson J.V.
        Gender diversity in academic radiology departments: barriers and best practices to optimizing inclusion and developing women leaders.
        Acad Radiol. 2018; 25: 556-560https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.08.018
        • Chowdhary M.
        • Chowdhary A.
        • Royce T.J.
        • Patel K.R.
        • Chhabra A.M.
        • Jain S.
        • et al.
        Women's representation in leadership positions in academic medical oncology, radiation oncology, and surgical oncology programs.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3e200708https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0708
        • Esfahani S.A.
        • Lee A.
        • Hu J.Y.
        • Kelly M.
        • Magudia K.
        • Everett C.
        • et al.
        Challenges faced by women in radiology during the pandemic - a summary of the AAWR Women's caucus at the ACR 2020 annual meeting.
        Clin Imaging. 2020; 68: 291-294https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.08.016
        • Lumpkin S.T.
        • Klein M.K.
        • Battarbee A.N.
        • Strassle P.D.
        • Scarlet S.
        • Duke M.C.
        Fellowship or family? A comparison of residency leave policies with the family and medical leave act.
        J Surg Res. 2019; 241: 302-307https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.004
        • Ghazi Sherbaf F.
        • Lin D.D.M.
        • Yousem D.M.
        Parental leave policy in radiology residency programs: current status.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2020; 17: 1163-1171https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.12.032
        • Magudia K.
        • Ng T.S.C.
        • Campbell S.R.
        • Balthazar P.
        • Dibble E.H.
        • Hassanzadeh C.J.
        • et al.
        Family and medical leave for diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, and radiation oncology residents in the United States: a policy opportunity.
        Radiology. 2021; 300: 31-35https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021210798
        • Radiology ABo
        Residency leave policy.
        • Harrington S.G.
        • Wood M.
        • Porter K.K.
        • Gupta Y.
        • Esfahani S.A.
        • Daye D.
        • et al.
        Promoting lactation support: challenges and solutions to supporting breastfeeding radiologists.
        Acad Radiol. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.11.009
        • Strouse P.J.
        • Romberg E.K.
        • Jarrett D.Y.
        • Dillman J.R.
        • Dessner D.A.
        • Reid J.R.
        • et al.
        The continuous lure of pediatric radiology.
        Pediatr Radiol. 2020; 50: 3-12https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04569-0
        • Kuhl C.K.
        The changing world of breast cancer: a Radiologist's perspective.
        Plast Surg Nurs. 2016; 36: 31-49https://doi.org/10.1097/PSN.0000000000000128
        • Itri J.N.
        Patient-centered radiology.
        Radiographics. 2015; 35: 1835-1846https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015150110
        • Arscott W.T.
        • Emmett J.
        • Ghiam A.F.
        • Jones J.A.
        Palliative radiotherapy: inpatients, outpatients, and the changing role of supportive Care in Radiation Oncology.
        Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2020; 34: 253-277https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hoc.2019.09.009
        • Koontz B.F.
        • Benda R.
        • De Los Santos J.
        • Hoffman K.E.
        • Huq M.S.
        • Morrell R.
        • et al.
        US radiation oncology practice patterns for posttreatment survivor care.
        Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016; 6: 50-56https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2015.10.002
        • Fatahi N.
        • Krupic F.
        • Hellstrom M.
        Quality of radiologists' communication with other clinicians–as experienced by radiologists.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2015; 98: 722-727https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.02.009
        • Society AC
        Cancer treatment & survivorship facts & figures 2019-2021.
        • Holodny E.
        Women are dominating the most important part of the US economy.
        • PR S.
        Why medical students are pursuing global health experiences—commentary.
        • Borromeo K.
        Beyond averages: do gender disparities exist in volunteering?.
        • England R.W.
        • Lugossy A.M.
        • Mollura D.J.
        Increasing opportunities for trainees to engage in Global Health radiology: radiology in training.
        Radiology. 2021; 300: E320-E322https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021210371
        • Mollura D.J.
        • Soroosh G.
        • Culp M.P.
        • Group R-ACW
        2016 RAD-AID conference on international radiology for developing countries: gaps, growth, and United Nations sustainable development goals.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: 841-847https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.049
      1. Radiology ACo. ACR Foundation. International outreach program. https://www.acr.org/Member-Resources/Volunteer/international-outreach.

        • Silva C.F.
        • Elizondo-Rojas G.
        • Atalabi O.
        • Karcaaltincaba M.
        • Morana G.
        • Mahmood U.
        • et al.
        RSNA Committee on international radiology education: 25 years of global education outreach.
        Radiographics. 2020; 40: 1938-1952https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020200100
        • Elmore S.N.C.
        • Royce T.J.
        • Oladeru O.T.
        • Freese C.M.
        • Wakefield D.V.
        • Vapiwala N.
        • et al.
        Global Health perspectives among radiation oncology residency program directors: a knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020; 107: 419-425https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.467
        • Wakefield DVL A.
        • Li B.
        Resident engagement in global health: results of the first decade (2009-2019) of the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) Global Health Initiative.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019; 105https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2126
        • Parikh J.R.
        • Geise R.A.
        • Bluth E.I.
        • Bender C.E.
        • Sze G.
        • Jones A.K.
        • et al.
        Potential radiation-related effects on radiologists.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017; 208: 595-602https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17212
        • Agency IAE
        Occupational Radiation Protection. IAEA Safety Standards for Protecting People and the Environment.
        2018
        • Deng J.
        • Fan S.
        • Wang T.
        • Hao S.
        • Liu X.
        • Guo W.
        • et al.
        Trends and distribution analysis of occupational exposure from medical practices in China (2010–2016).
        Health Phys. 2019; 117: 656-660https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001118
        • Radiation UNSCotEoA
        UNSCEAR 2008 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes.
        • Zhang J.
        • Spicer P.J.
        • Oates M.E.
        Physics teaching of radiology residents: how much is too much?.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2021; 18: 90-92https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.09.035
        • Wu T.C.
        • McCloskey S.A.
        • Wallner P.E.
        • Steinberg M.L.
        • Raldow A.C.
        The declining residency applicant pool: a multi-institutional medical student survey to identify precipitating factors.
        Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021; 6100597https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2020.10.010
        • Syed A.B.
        • Zoga A.C.
        Artificial intelligence in radiology: current technology and future directions.
        Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2018; 22: 540-545https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1673383
      2. A Patel . AI has the potential to elevate the way we practice.

        • Thompson R.F.
        • Valdes G.
        • Fuller C.D.
        • Carpenter C.M.
        • Morin O.
        • Aneja S.
        • et al.
        Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology: a specialty-wide disruptive transformation?.
        Radiother Oncol. 2018; 129: 421-426https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.030
        • Berg S.
        Pay inequity, flex schedules top concerns for women physicians.
        • Rosenkrantz A.B.
        • Hanna T.N.
        • Steenburg S.D.
        • Tarrant M.J.
        • Pyatt R.S.
        • Friedberg E.B.
        The current state of teleradiology across the United States: a National Survey of Radiologists' habits, attitudes, and perceptions on teleradiology practice.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2019; 16: 1677-1687https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.053
        • Guilford-Blake R.
        Women radiologists find their voice and make it heard.
        • Sunshine J.H.
        • Lewis R.S.
        Trends in work hours and vacation time among radiologists in the United States.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193: 1136-1140https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2508
        • Zafar H.M.
        • Lewis R.S.
        • Sunshine J.H.
        Satisfaction of radiologists in the United States: a comparison between 2003 and 1995.
        Radiology. 2007; 244: 223-231https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2441061049
        • Shanafelt T.D.
        • Hasan O.
        • Dyrbye L.N.
        • Sinsky C.
        • Satele D.
        • Sloan J.
        • et al.
        Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2014.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2015; 90: 1600-1613https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.023
        • Pohar S.
        • Fung C.Y.
        • Hopkins S.
        • Miller R.
        • Azawi S.
        • Arnone A.
        • et al.
        American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) 2012 workforce study: the radiation oncologists' and residents' perspectives.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013; 87: 1135-1140https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.08.038