- •Prevalence of neoplasia at repeat CTC after a negative baseline exam was assessed.
- •3 masses were detected in 3/636 participants (0.47%) at a mean 4.6-year interval.
- •52 neoplasia ≥6 mm were found in 7.4% of participants, with/without risk factors.
- •This supports recommendations for a 5-year interval after negative baseline CTC.
Assess the prevalence of neoplasia ≥6 mm at repeat CT colonoscopy (CTC) in individuals with no significant lesions at baseline.
Individuals aged ≥18 years, with/without CRC risk factors, with no polyps ≥6 mm on baseline CTC (negative baseline) who underwent repeat CTC in a large HMO from 2001 to 2011 were retrospectively identified. Studies were reviewed by board-certified radiologists with experience interpreting CTC. Demographic details, CRC risk factors, and the number, size, and location of incident lesions were noted. Findings were classified using the C-RADS scale. Lesion prevalence at CTC-2 was determined, and study interval and risk characteristics of patients with- and without findings were compared.
Our study included 636 individuals (369 men [58.0%]; mean age 59.9 years) with negative baseline CTC who underwent repeat CTC after a mean 4.6 year interval (SD 1.6 years). At baseline, 469/636 (73.7%) were at average risk for CRC; 418 remained at average risk for CTC-2 with 51 (8.0%) developing new risk factors in the interval between studies. At CTC-2, 47 participants (7.4%) presented 52 significant neoplasia: 35 polyps 6–9 mm, 14 polyps ≥10 mm, and 3 masses in 3/636 participants (0.47%). 2/3 masses, 6/14 polyps ≥10 mm (42.9%), and 12/25 polyps 6–9 mm (48.0%) were in individuals with risk factors for CRC. Histopathology was available for 12/52 lesions (23.1%): 8 tubular adenomas, 2 villous adenomas, 1 hamartomatous polyp, 1 case of normal tissue.
A mean 4.6 years after negative-baseline CTC, neoplasia ≥6 mm were seen in 7.4% of participants, including masses in 0.47%, supporting recommendations for a 5-year study interval.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3: 524-548
- Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.Int J Cancer. 2015; 136: E359-E386
- Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.BMJ. 2014; 348: g2467
- Colorectal cancer screening: recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer.Am J Gastroenterol. 2017; 112: 1016-1030
- Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population.Gut. 2009; 58: 241-248
- Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults.N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 2191-2200
- Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review.Am J Gastroenterol. 2006; 101: 343-350
- Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection–systematic review and meta-analysis.Radiology. 2011; 259: 393-405
- Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates.Radiology. 2004; 232: 784-790
- Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography.Radiology. 2004; 230: 629-636
- The efficacy of intravenous contrast-enhanced 16-raw multidetector CT colonography for detecting patients with colorectal polyps in an asymptomatic population in Korea.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008; 42: 791-798
- Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers.N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 1207-1217
- Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis.Eur Radiol. 2011; 21: 1747-1763
- Teleradiology based CT colonography to screen a population group of a remote island; at average risk for colorectal cancer.Eur J Radiol. 2013; 82: e262-e267
- Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.Lancet. 2013; 381: 1194-1202
- Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation.Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98: 578-585
- CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation.Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 146-156
- Preference for colonoscopy versus computerized tomographic colonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.J Gen Intern Med. 2012; 27: 1349-1360
- CT colonography may improve colorectal cancer screening compliance.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195: 1118-1123
- Screening CT colonography: multicenter survey of patient experience, preference, and potential impact on adherence.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198: 1361-1366
- Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial.Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13: 55-64
- CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia.N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 1403-1412
- Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.Gastroenterology. 2008; 134: 1570-1595
- American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104: 739-750
- Guidance on the use of CT colonography for suspected colorectal cancer.https://www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_publication_files/BFCR(14)9_COLON.pdfDate: 2014Date accessed: June 29, 2018
- CT colonography for investigation of patients with symptoms potentially suggestive of colorectal cancer: a review of the UK SIGGAR trials.Br J Radiol. 2013; 86: 20130137
- ACR-SAR-SCBT-MR practice parameter for the performance of computed tomography (CT) colonography in adults.https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/ct-colonog.pdfDate: 2014Date accessed: September 4, 2018
- ACR Colon Cancer committee white paper: status of CT colonography 2009.J Am Coll Radiol. 2009; 6 ([e4]): 756-772
- CT colonography: accuracy, acceptance, safety and position in organised population screening.Gut. 2015; 64: 342-350
- Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) guideline.Eur Radiol. 2015; 25: 331-345
- CT colonography: over two decades from discovery to practice.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018; 43: 517-522
- Screening for colorectal cancer: us preventive services task force recommendation statement.JAMA. 2016; 315: 2564-2575
- CT colonography: performance and program outcome measures in an older screening population.Radiology. 2010; 254: 493-500
- Progress and challenges in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.Gastroenterology. 2010; 138: 2115-2126
- Colorectal cancer guidelines.http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2500006-overviewDate: 2017Date accessed: July 13, 2017
- CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal.Radiology. 2005; 236: 3-9
- Post-imaging colorectal cancer or interval cancer rates after CT colonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 3: 326-336
- Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer.Society. 2018; 68: 250-281
- CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS): benchmark values from a clinical screening program.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202: 1232-1237
- Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of interval colorectal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Gastroenterol. 2014; 109: 1375-1389
- Five year colorectal cancer outcomes in a large negative CT colonography screening cohort.Eur Radiol. 2012; 22: 1488-1494
- Colorectal findings at repeat CT colonography screening after initial CT colonography screening negative for polyps larger than 5 mm.Radiology. 2017; 282: 139-148
- Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer.JAMA. 2009; 301: 2453-2461
- Current status on performance of CT colonography and clinical indications.Eur J Radiol. 2013; 82: 1192-1200
- Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.Lancet. 2013; 381: 1185-1193
- Colorectal cancer guidelines - colorectal cancer screening.Medscape Med News. 2018;https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2500006-overviewDate accessed: January 22, 2019
- European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: overview and introduction to the full supplement publication.Endoscopy. 2013; 45: 51-59
Published online: January 20, 2019
Accepted: January 15, 2019
Received in revised form: January 14, 2019
Received: November 25, 2018
© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.