Advertisement

Stereotactic breast biopsy efficiency: Does a pre-biopsy grid image help?

      Highlights

      • Radiologists vary in practice with some obtaining a grid image to mark the skin overlying a biopsy target prior to biopsy.
      • Grid imaging prior to biopsy increases the number of images obtained but decreases retargeting and biopsy table time.
      • Grid imaging uses room/technologist time and should be used judiciously when prone positioning is challenging to patients.

      Abstract

      Objective

      Prior to stereotactic breast biopsy, some radiologists obtain a mammogram image with an overlying alphanumeric grid to mark the skin overlying the target. Our purpose is to determine if this grid image affects stereotactic biopsy efficiency and accuracy, including total images obtained, procedure time and need for retargeting.

      Materials and methods

      IRB approved, HIPAA compliant retrospective review of prone stereotactic biopsy cases targeting calcifications 9/1/2015 to 9/1/2016 was performed. Images and reports were reviewed for number and type of images obtained, evidence of retargeting and biopsy table time. Attending radiologist, technologist and trainee involvement were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing SAS statistical software v 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

      Results

      Of 463 women (avg age 58.0 years, range 30–94), 392/463 (84.7%) had grid images obtained pre-biopsy. Grid patients had more images total than non-grid (avg 9.26 versus 8.44 images/patient; p < 0.0001) but spent less time on the biopsy table (avg 15 min 2 s versus 16 min 44 s/procedure; p < 0.0001). Non-grid patients were more likely to undergo initial retargeting (45% non-grid vs 30% of grid patients; p = 0.013); however, later retargeting after needle placement was comparable (p = 0.3).

      Conclusion

      Grid imaging increases images obtained but decreases retargeting and biopsy table time at the expense of mammogram room/technologist time to obtain the grid image. The overall result is longer total procedure time (grid time plus table time) for the patient/technologist. A grid image therefore has limited usefulness and should be used judiciously in cases where prone positioning is challenging to patients.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Feig S.A.
        Decreased breast cancer mortality through mammographic screening: results of clinical trials.
        Radiology. 1988; 167: 659-665
        • Tabar L.
        • Fagerberg G.
        • Duffy S.W.
        • et al.
        Update of the Swedish two- county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 1992; 30: 187-210
        • Nelson H.D.
        • Tyne K.
        • Naik A.
        • et al.
        Screening for breast cancer: systematic evidence review update for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
        Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 727-737
        • Seidman H.
        • Gelb S.K.
        • Silvergert E.
        • et al.
        Survival experience in the breast cancer detection demonstration project.
        Cancer J Clin. 1987; 37: 258-290
        • Schmidt R.A.
        Stereotactic breast biopsy.
        Cancer J Clin. May–Jun 1994; 44: 172-191
        • Vandromme M.J.
        • Umphrey H.
        • Krontiras H.
        Image-guided methods for biopsy of suspicious breast lesions.
        J Surg Oncol. 2011; 103: 299-305
        • Huang M.L.
        • Adrada B.E.
        • Candelaria R.
        • Thames D.
        • Dawson D.
        • Yang W.T.
        Stereotactic breast biopsy: pitfalls and pearls.
        Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. Mar 2014; 17: 32-39
        • Liberman L.
        Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 2002; 40: 483-500
        • O'Flynn E.A.M.
        • Wilson A.R.M.
        • Michell M.J.
        Image-guided breast biopsy: state-of-the-art.
        Clin Radiol. 2010; 65: 259-270
        • Fahrbach K.
        • Sledge I.
        • Cella C.
        • et al.
        A comparison of the accuracy of two minimally invasive breast biopsy methods: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006; 274: 63-73
        • Mahoney M.C.
        • Newell M.S.
        Breast intervention: how I do it.
        Radiology. 2013; 268: 12-24
        • Ed Dershaw D.D.
        Imaging-guided interventional techniques.
        Springer, 2003 (Chapter 5 By L Liberman Stereotactic Core Biopsy, pp. 92–93)
        • Price E.R.
        • Joe B.N.
        • Sickles E.A.
        The developing asymmetry: revisiting a perceptual and diagnostic challenge.
        Radiology. 2015; 274: 642-651
        • Norris T.G.
        Stereotactic breast biopsy.
        Radiol Technol. 2001; 72: 431-454
        • Schrading S.
        • Distelmaier M.
        • Dirrichs T.
        • et al.
        Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experience and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy.
        Radiology. 2014; 274: 654-662