Artificial intelligence and deep learning – Radiology's next frontier?

Published:November 16, 2017DOI:


      Tracing the use of computers in the radiology department from administrative functions through image acquisition, storage, and reporting, to early attempts at improved diagnosis, we begin to imagine possible new frontiers for their use in exam interpretation. Given their initially slow but ultimately substantial progress in the noninterpretive areas, we are left desiring and even expecting more in the interpretation realm. New technological advances may provide the next wave of progress and radiologists should be early adopters. Several potential applications are discussed and hopefully will serve to inspire future progress.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Mixdorf M.A.
        • Goldsworthy R.E.
        A history of computers and computerized imaging.
        Radiol Technol. Mar–Apr 1996; 67: 291-296
        • Arenson R.L.
        • Andriole K.P.
        • Avrin D.E.
        • Gould R.G.
        Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future.
        J Digit Imaging. Nov 2000; 13: 145-156
        • Arenson R.L.
        • Avrin D.E.
        • Wong A.
        • et al.
        Second generation folder manager for PACS.
        in: Proceedings of SCAR 1994. Jun 12–15 1994: 601-605 (Winston-Salem, NC)
        • Mayo R.C.
        • Pearson K.L.
        • Avrin D.E.
        • Leung J.W.T.
        The economic and social value of an image exchange network: a case for the cloud.
        JACR. Jan 2017; 14: 130-134
        • Cupples T.E.
        • Cunningham J.E.
        • Reynolds J.C.
        Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. Oct 2005; 185: 944-950
        • Freer T.W.
        • Ulissey M.J.
        Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center.
        Radiology. Sep 2001; 220: 781-786
        • Morton M.J.
        • Whaley D.H.
        • Brandt K.R.
        • Amrami K.K.
        Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection–prospective evaluation.
        Radiology. May 2006; 239 ([Epub 2006 Mar 28]): 375-383
        • Castellino R.A.
        Computer aided detection (CAD): an overview.
        Cancer Imaging. 2005; 5: 17-19
        • Bandodkar P.
        • Birdwell R.
        • Ikeda D.
        Computer aided detection (CAD) with screening mammography in an academic institution: preliminary findings.
        Radiology. 2002; 225: 458
        • Nicholas M.J.
        • Slanetz P.J.
        • Mendel J.B.
        Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography: work in progress.
        AJR. 2004; 182: 32-33
        • Cupples T.E.
        Impact of computer-aided detection (CAD) in a regional screening mammography program.
        Radiology. 2001; 221: 520
        • Gur D.
        • Sumkin J.H.
        • Rockette H.E.
        • et al.
        Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after introduction of a computer-aided detection system.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96: 185-190
        • Feig S.A.
        • Sickles E.A.
        • Evans W.P.
        • Linver M.N.
        Letter to the editor. Re: changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after introduction of a computer-aided detection system.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96: 1260-1261
        • Burhenne L.J.W.
        • et al.
        Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
        Radiology. May 2000; 215
        • Lehman C.D.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and without computer-aided detection.
        JAMA Intern Med. Nov 2015; 175
        • Fenton J.J.
        • Taplin N.
        Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography.
        Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1399-1409
        • Alcusky M.
        • Philpotts L.
        • Bonafede M.
        • et al.
        The patient burden of screening mammography recall.
        J Womens Health. 2014; 23
      1. Clark L. Google's artificial brain learns to find cat videos. Wired UK Science, Jun 26 2012 ({Internet}. Available from)
      2. Markoff J How many computers to identify a cat? 16,000. New York Times, 2012
      3. The digital mammography DREAM challenge.
        • Sprague B.L.
        • et al.
        National performance benchmarks for modern diagnostic digital mammography: update from the breast cancer surveillance consortium.
        Radiology. Apr 2017; 283: 59-69
        • Van Ginneken
        • et al.
        Computer-aided diagnosis: how to move from the laboratory to the clinic.
        Radiology. Dec 2011; 261
        • Mayo R.C.
        • Parikh J.
        Breast imaging: the face of imaging 3.0.
        J Am Coll Radiol. Aug 2016; 13: 1003-1007