Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 45, P111-117, September 2017

Hepatic fat quantification using automated six-point Dixon: Comparison with conventional chemical shift based sequences and computed tomography

      Highlights

      • Automated hepatic fat fraction of 6-p Dixon was accurate correlation with chemical shift imaging.
      • Automated hepatic fat fraction of 6-p Dixon was accurate correlation with CT attenuation value.
      • Imaged fat fraction of 6-p Dixon has the potential for automated hepatic fat quantification.

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To compare automated six-point Dixon (6-p-Dixon) MRI comparing with dual-echo chemical-shift-imaging (CSI) and CT for hepatic fat fraction in phantoms and clinical study.

      Materials and methods

      Phantoms and fifty-nine patients were examined both MRI and CT for quantitative fat measurements.

      Results

      In phantom study, linear regression between fat concentration and 6-p-Dixon showed good agreement. In clinical study, linear regression between 6-p-Dixon and dual-echo CSI showed good agreement. CT attenuation value was strongly correlated with 6-p-Dixon (R2 = 0.852; P < 0.001) and dual-echo CSI (R2 = 0.812; P < 0.001).

      Conclusion

      Automated 6-p-Dixon and dual-echo CSI were accurate correlation with CT attenuation value of liver parenchyma. 6-p-Dixon has the potential for automated hepatic fat quantification.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wu Z.
        • Matsui O.
        • Kitao A.
        • et al.
        Usefulness of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging in the evaluation of simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013; 37: 1137-1143
        • Brunt E.M.
        Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.
        Semin Liver Dis. 2004; 24: 3-20
        • Garcia-Compean D.
        • Cortes C.
        Transjugular liver biopsy. An update.
        Ann Hepatol. 2004; 3: 100-103
        • Strassburg C.P.
        • Manns M.P.
        Approaches to liver biopsy techniques-revisited.
        Semin Liver Dis. 2006; 26: 318-327
        • Mottin C.C.
        • Moretto M.
        • Padoin A.V.
        • et al.
        The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis in morbidly obese patients.
        Obes Surg. 2004; 14: 635-637
        • Kodama Y.
        • Ng C.S.
        • Wu T.T.
        • et al.
        Comparison of CT methods for determining the fat content of the liver.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188: 1307-1312
        • Lee S.W.
        • Park S.H.
        • Kim K.W.
        • et al.
        Unenhanced CT for assessment of macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living liver donors: comparison of visual grading with liver attenuation index.
        Radiology. 2007; 244: 479-485
        • Limanond P.
        • Raman S.S.
        • Lassman C.
        • et al.
        Macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living related liver donors: correlation between CT and histologic findings.
        Radiology. 2004; 230: 276-280
        • Kim H.
        • Taksali S.E.
        • Dufour S.
        • et al.
        Comparative MR study of hepatic fat quantification using single-voxel proton spectroscopy, two-point dixon and three-point IDEAL.
        Magn Reson Med. 2008; 59: 521-527
        • Hetterich H.
        • Bayerl C.
        • Peters A.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of a three-step magnetic resonance imaging approach for the assessment of hepatic steatosis in an asymptomatic study population.
        Eur Radiol. 2016; 25: 1895-1904
        • Henninger B.
        • Zoller H.
        • Rauch S.
        • et al.
        Automated two-point dixon screening for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis and siderosis: comparison with R2-relaxometry and chemical shift-based sequences.
        Eur Radiol. 2015; 25: 1356-1365
        • Idilman I.S.
        • Keskin O.
        • Celik A.
        • et al.
        A comparison of liver fat content as determined by magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction and MRS versus liver histology in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
        Acta Radiol. 2015; 8
        • Reeder S.B.
        • Cruite I.
        • Hamilton G.
        • Sirlin C.B.
        Quantitative assessment of liver fat with magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 34: 729-749
        • Hernando D.
        • Wells S.A.
        • Vigen K.K.
        • Reeder S.B.
        Effect of hepatocyte-specific gadolinium-based contrast agents on hepatic fat-fraction and R2*.
        Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 33: 43-50
        • Lee S.S.
        • Lee Y.
        • Kim N.
        • et al.
        Hepatic fat quantification using chemical shift MR imaging and MR spectroscopy in the presence of hepatic iron deposition: validation in phantoms and in patients with chronic liver disease.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 33: 1390-1398
        • Meisamy S.
        • Hines C.D.
        • Hamilton G.
        • et al.
        Quantification of hepatic steatosis with T1-independent, T2-corrected MR imaging with spectral modeling of fat: blinded comparison with MR spectroscopy.
        Radiology. 2011; 256: 767-775
        • Hines C.D.
        • Frydrychowicz A.
        • Hamilton G.
        • et al.
        T(1) independent, T(2) (*) corrected chemical shift based fat-water separation with multi-peak fat spectral modeling is an accurate and precise measure of hepatic steatosis.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 33: 873-881
        • Park Y.S.
        • Lee C.H.
        • Kim J.H.
        • et al.
        Effect of Gd-EOB-DTPA on hepatic fat quantification using high-speed T2-corrected multi-echo acquisition in (1) H MR spectroscopy.
        Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 32: 886-890
        • Yu H.
        • Shimakawa A.
        • Hines C.D.
        • et al.
        Combination of complex-based and magnitude-based multiecho water-fat separation for accurate quantification of fat-fraction.
        Magn Reson Med. 2011; 66: 199-206
        • Reeder S.B.
        • Robson P.M.
        • Yu H.
        • et al.
        Quantification of hepatic steatosis with MRI: the effects of accurate fat spectral modeling.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009; 29: 1332-1339
        • Yu H.
        • McKenzie C.A.
        • Shimakawa A.
        • et al.
        Multiecho reconstruction for simultaneous water-fat decomposition and T2* estimation.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 26: 1153-1161
        • Kuhn J.P.
        • Hernando D.
        • Mensel B.
        • et al.
        Quantitative chemical shift-encoded MRI is an accurate method to quantify hepatic steatosis.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014; 39: 1494-1501
        • Nakamura S.
        • Namimoto T.
        • Morita K.
        • et al.
        Characterization of adrenal lesions using chemical shift MRI: comparison between 1.5 Tesla and two echo time pair selection at 3.0 Tesla MRI.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 35: 95-102
        • Mitchell D.G.
        • Stolpen A.H.
        • Siegelman E.S.
        • et al.
        Fatty tissue on opposed-phase MR images: paradoxical suppression of signal intensity by paramagnetic contrast agents.
        Radiology. 1996; 198: 351-357
        • Westphalen A.C.
        • Qayyum A.
        • Yeh B.M.
        • et al.
        Liver fat: effect of hepatic iron deposition on evaluation with opposed-phase MR imaging.
        Radiology. 2007; 242: 450-455
        • O'regan D.P.
        • Callaghan M.F.
        • Wylezinska-Arridge M.
        • et al.
        Liver fat content and T2*: simultaneous measurement by using breath-hold multiecho MR imaging at 3.0 T-feasibility.
        Radiology. 2008; 247: 550-557
        • Yokoo T.
        • Bydder M.
        • Hamilton G.
        • et al.
        Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: diagnostic fat-grading accuracy of low-flip-angle multiecho gradient-recalled-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T.
        Radiology. 2009; 251: 67-76
        • Yoshimitsu K.
        • Kuroda Y.
        • Nakamuta M.
        • et al.
        Noninvasive estimation of hepatic steatosis using plain CT vs. chemical-shift MR imaging: significance for living donors.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008; 28: 678-684
        • Lee S.S.
        • Park S.H.
        • Kim H.J.
        • et al.
        Non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: prospective comparison of the accuracy of imaging examinations.
        J Hepatol. 2010; 52: 579-585
        • Maruzzelli L.
        • Parr A.J.
        • Miraglia R.
        • et al.
        Quantification of hepatic steatosis: a comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance indices in candidates for living liver donation.
        Acad Radiol. 2014; 21: 507-513
        • Ma X.
        • Holalkere N.S.
        • Kambadakone R.A.
        • et al.
        Imaging-based quantification of hepatic fat: methods and clinical applications.
        Radiographics. 2009; 29: 1253-1277