Abstract
Breast tomosynthesis, a three-dimensional x-ray based breast imaging technology, has
been available for clinical use in the United States since 2011. In this paper we
review the literature on breast cancer screening with this new technology including
where gaps in knowledge remain.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Clinical ImagingAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Breast Cancer Facts & Figs.2013–2014
- Canadian Cancer Statistics 2013.Canadian Cancer Society, Toronto, ON2013
- Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 716-726
- Breast cancer screening: benefits and harms.JAMA. 2014; 312: 2585https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.13195
- Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in the digital mammographic imaging screening trial (DMIST).Radiology. 2008; 246: 376-383
- Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 583-589
- Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.Radiology. 2013; 267: 47-56
- Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography.AJR. 2001; 177: 543-549
- Adherence to cancer screening guidelines across Canadian provinces: an observational study.BMC Cancer. 2010; 10: 304-312
- A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme.J Med Screen. 1998; 5: 195-201
- Selenia Dimensions 3D System - P080003 [Internet].(Available from:)
- Selenia Dimensions 3D System - P080003/S001 [Internet].(Available from:)
- SenoClaire - P130020 [Internet].(Available from:)
- Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.JAMA. 2014; 311: 2499-2507
- Initial experience with combination digital TM plus full field digital mammography or full field digital mammography alone in the screening environment.J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014; 4 ([7514.127838. eCollection 2014]): 4-9
- Implementation of TM in a routine screening practice: an observational study.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200: 1401-1408
- The TOMMY trial: a comparison of Tomosynthesis with digital Mammography in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital TM and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.Health Technol Assess. 2015; 19 ([i,xxv]): 1-136
- Clinical implementation of digital TM.Radiol Clin North Am. 2014; 52: 499-518
- Changes in recall type and patient treatment following implementation of screening digital TM.Radiology. 2015; 274: 337-342
- Two-view digital TM screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital TM with full-field digital mammographic images.Radiology. 2014; 271: 655-663
- Review of radiation dose estimates in digital TM relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography.Breast. 2015; 24: 93-99
- Comparative evaluation of average glandular dose and breast cancer detection between single-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus single-view digital mammography (DM) and two-view DM: correlation with breast thickness and density.Eur Radiol. 2014; 25: 1-8
- Dense breasts: a review of reporting legislation and available supplemental screening options.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 203: 449-456
- Application of TM in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time.Br J Radiol. 2012; 85: e1174-e1178
- Addition of tomosynthesis to conventional digital mammography: effect on image interpretation time of screening examinations.Radiology. 2014; 270: 49-56
- Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts.Radiology. 2015; 274: 772-780
- Value analysis of digital TM for breast cancer screening in a commercially-insured US population.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2015; 7: 53-63
- American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an adjunct to Mammography.CA Cancer J Clin. 2007; 57: 75-89
- Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening.Radiographics. 2015; 35: 302-315
- Screening outcomes following implementation of digital TM in a general-population screening program.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014; 106 ([Print 2014 Nov])https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju316
- Comparison of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography and digital mammography alone for breast cancer screening.Radiology. 2013; 269: 694-700
- Early clinical experience with digital TM for screening mammography.Radiology. 2015; 274: 85-92
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: September 18, 2015
Accepted:
September 15,
2015
Received in revised form:
August 5,
2015
Received:
April 16,
2015
Identification
Copyright
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
