Abstract
Purpose
The purpose was to compare first-pass and delayed-phase thoracic computed tomography
(CT) venography for the evaluation of suspected central thoracic venous pathology.
Material and methods
CT images and medical records of all patients who underwent thoracic CT venography
over a 5-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Both first-pass (18 s) and delayed-phase (60 s) venous images were obtained in all patients. The images were reviewed in random
order by three readers using a semiquantitative visual grading scheme for image quality,
including artifacts and the uniformity of venous enhancement. In addition, enhancement
was quantitatively evaluated. The presence and type of venous pathology, and overall
diagnostic confidence were recorded and compared. Reference verification was performed
when available.
Results
Eighteen patients formed the study group, mean age 49.5 years and 28% male. Dual-arm injection was successful in 72% of exams. All readers
reported more streak artifacts on first-pass imaging than delayed imaging (72%–94%
vs. 27%–44%, respectively; P<.05). First-pass imaging had significantly higher measured enhancement across all
central venous segments than delayed imaging (mean HU range 212–906 HU vs. 173–414
HU; P<.05) but also had significantly more heterogeneous enhancement (mean S.D. range 75–1058
HU vs. 67–378 HU; P<.05). For overall diagnosis, reader agreement, accuracy, and confidence levels were
higher for delayed-phase images (P<.05).
Conclusion
Indirect thoracic CT venography using delayed-phase imaging alone may be sufficient
for evaluating clinically suspected central venous abnormality.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Clinical ImagingAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Radionuclide venography and its functional analysis in superior vena cava syndrome.J Nucl Med. 1996; 37: 1460-1464
- Computed tomography of the superior vena cava.Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1986; 25: 373-429
- MRI evaluation of mediastinal and thoracic inlet venous obstruction.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986; 146: 679-684
- Computed tomographic evaluation of compression of the superior vena cava and its tributaries.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1985; 8: 89-99
- Computed tomography of superior vena cava obstruction.J Thorac Imaging. 1987; 2: 72-78
- Thoracic collateral venous channels: normal and pathologic CT findings.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1990; 14: 769-773
- Helical CT phlebography of the superior vena cava: diagnosis and evaluation of venous obstruction.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172: 1327-1333
- CT angiography of the superior vena cava: normative values and implications for central venous catheter position.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007; 18: 1106-1110
- The value of radionuclide venography in superior vena caval obstruction.Clin Radiol. 1985; 36: 415-418
- Central veins of the chest: evaluation with time-resolved MR angiography.Radiology. 2008; 247: 558-566
- Reduction of contrast material dose and artifacts by a saline flush using a double power injector in helical CT of the thorax.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174: 1049-1053
- Comparison of enhancement, image quality, cost, and adverse reactions using 2 different contrast medium concentrations for routine chest CT on 16-slice MDCT.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006; 30: 818-822
- Evaluation of CT time–density curves of lower limb veins.Invest Radiol. 2001; 36: 164-169
Article info
Publication history
Published online: February 11, 2015
Accepted:
February 5,
2015
Received in revised form:
January 14,
2015
Received:
July 3,
2014
Footnotes
☆Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center For Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR000433.
Identification
Copyright
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.