Advertisement

Clinical utility of dual-energy CT for gout diagnosis

Published:February 10, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.12.015

      Abstract

      Objective

      The present study was to evaluate the clinical value of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for detecting monosodium urate crystals in patients with gouty arthritis.

      Methods

      Two hundred and two patients, who experienced arthrocele and (or) joint pain, were enrolled into our study. DECT scans of upper or lower extremity were performed. One hundred and sixty one patients who conformed to the American College of Rheumatology classification standard were defined as the gout group. The rest (41) of the patients were regarded as the without-gout group. DE (80 kV/140 kV) datasets were reconstructed via DE gout software. Images were reviewed independently by two senior radiologists.

      Results

      In the gout group, DECT scans revealed a total of 379 areas of urate deposition in 121 patients. In the without-gout group, 3 areas of green urate deposition were detected. The sensitivity and specificity were 75.2% and 92.7%, respectively; when we increased the ratio to 1.32 and decreased the range to 3, the number of patients with green urate deposition increased, and the areas of urate deposition were more extensive. The sensitivity and specificity were 91.9% and 85.4%. DECT images could illustrate the palpable reduction in the tissue urate deposits compared to baseline images before and after treatment.

      Conclusions

      DECT has comparable sensitivity and specificity for the detection of gouty arthritis in a clinical setting, and DECT can monitor the clinical treatment. However, DECT results should be interpreted carefully because there could be some false-negative or false-positive findings.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Monu JU
        • Pope TL
        Gout: a clinical and radiologic review.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 2004; 42: 169-184
        • Gentili A
        Advanced imaging of gout.
        Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2003; 7: 165-174
        • Roddy Edward
        • Zhang Weiya
        • Doherty Michael
        The changing epidemiology of gout.
        Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007; 3: 443-449
        • Tausche AK
        • Jansen TL
        • Schröder HE
        • Bornstein SR
        • Aringer M
        • Müller-Ladner U
        Gout—current diagnosis and treatment.
        Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009; 106: 549-555
        • Richette P
        • Bardin T
        Gout.
        Lancet. 2010; 375: 318-328
        • Choi HK
        • Curhan G
        Independent impact of gout on mortality and risk for coronary heart disease.
        Circulation. 2007; 116: 894-900
        • Choi HK
        • Ford ES
        Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in individuals with hyperuricemia.
        Am J Med. 2007; 120: 442-447
        • Choi HK
        • Ford ES
        • Li C
        • Curhan G
        Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in patients with gout: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
        Arthritis Rheum. 2007; 57: 109-115
        • Kim SY
        • Guevara JP
        • Kim KM
        • Choi HK
        • Heitjan DF
        • Albert DA
        Hyperuricemia and risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Arthritis Rheum. 2009; 61: 885-892
        • Nicolaou S
        • Liang T
        • Murphy DT
        • Korzan JR
        • Ouellette H
        • Munk P
        Dual-energy CT: a promising new technique for assessment of the musculoskeletal system.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199: S78-S86
        • Tins BJ
        • Butler R
        Imaging in rheumatology: reconciling radiology and rheumatology.
        Insight Imaging. 2013; 49: 799-810
        • Nicolaou S
        • Yong-Hing CJ
        • Galea-Soler S
        • Hou DJ
        • Louis L
        • Munk P
        Dual- energy CT as a potential new diagnostic tool in the management of gout in the acute setting.
        AJR. 2010; 194: 1072-1078
        • Choi HK
        • Al-Arfaj AM
        • Eftekhari A
        • Munk PL
        • Shojania K
        • Reid G
        • et al.
        Dual energy computed tomography in tophaceous gout.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68: 1609-1612
        • Desai MA
        • Peterson JJ
        • Garner HW
        • Kransdorf MJ
        Clinical utility of dual-energy CT for evaluation of tophaceous gout.
        RadioGraphics. 2011; 31: 1365-1375
        • Glazebrook Katrina N
        • Guimarães Luis S
        • Murthy Naveen S
        • Black David F
        • Bongartz Tim
        • Manek Nisha J
        • et al.
        Identification of intraarticular and periarticular uric acid crystals with dual-energy CT: initial evaluation.
        Radiology. 2011; 261: 516-524
        • Nicolaou Savvas
        • Co Steven John
        • Hou.gout Daniel James
        Johnson T Fink C Schönberg SO Reiser MF Dual energy CT in clinical practice. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg2011: 199-213
        • Luk AJ
        • Simkin PA
        Epidemiology of hyperuricemia and gout.
        Am J Manag Care. 2005; 11 ([quiz S465-8]): S435-S442
        • Annemans L
        • Spaepen E
        • Gaskin M
        • Bonnemaire M
        • Malier V
        • Gilbert T
        • et al.
        Gout in the UK and Germany: prevalence, comorbidities and management in general practice 2000–2005.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2008; 67: 960-966
        • Lawrence RC
        • Felson DT
        • Helmick CG
        • Arnold LM
        • Choi H
        • Deyo RA
        • et al.
        National arthritis data workgroup. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II.
        Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58: 26-35
        • Fravel MA
        • Ernst ME
        Management of gout in the older adult.
        Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2011; 9: 271-285
        • Terkeltaub RA
        Clinical practice. Gout.
        N Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 1647-1655
        • Stamp LK
        • Zhu X
        • Dalbeth N
        • Jordan S
        • Edwards NL
        • Taylor W
        Serum urate as a soluble biomaker in chronic gout-evidence that serum urate fulfills the OMER-CT validation criteria for soluble biomarkers.
        Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 40: 483-500
        • Nakayama D
        • Barthelemy C
        • Carrera G
        • Lightfoot R
        • Wortmann R
        Tophaceous gout: a clinical and radiographic assessment.
        Arthritis Rheum. 1984; 27: 468-471
        • Li EK
        Gout: a review of its aetiology and treatment.
        Hong Kong Med J. 2004; 10: 261-270
        • Swan A
        • Amer H
        • Dieppe P
        The value of synovial fluid assays in the diagnosis of joint disease: a literature survey.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2002; 61: 493-498
        • Spermon J
        • Van Dijke CF
        Dual energy CT: added value in gouty arthritis.
        JBR-BTR. 2013; 96: 34-37
        • Dalbeth N
        • Aati O
        • Gao A
        • House M
        • Liu Q
        • Horme A
        • et al.
        Assessment of tophus size: a comparison between physical measurement methods and dual-energy computed tomography scanning.
        J Clin Rheumatol. 2012; 18: 23-27
        • Kim SK
        • Lee H
        • Kim JH
        • Park SH
        • Lee SK
        • Choe JY
        Potential interest of dual-energy computed tomography in gout: focus on anatomical distribution and clinical association.
        Rheumatology. 2013; 52: 402-403
        • Choi HK
        • Burns LC
        • Shojania K
        • Koenig N
        • Reid G
        • Abufayyah M
        • et al.
        Dual energy CT in gout: a prospective validation study.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2012; 71: 1466-1471
        • McQueen FM
        • Doyle AJ
        • Reeves Q
        • Gamble GD
        • Dalbeth N
        DECT urate deposits: now you see them, now you don't.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72: 458-459
        • Sun Y
        • Ma L
        • Zhou Y
        • Chen H
        • Ding Y
        • Wei L
        • et al.
        Features of urate deposition in patients with gouty arthritis of the foot using dual-energy computed tomography.
        Int J Rheum Dis. 2013; ([Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.12194
        • Glazebrook KN
        • Kakar S
        • Ida KM
        • Laurini JA
        • Moder KG
        • Leng S
        False-negative dual-energy computed tomography in a patient with acute gout.
        J Clin Rheumatol. 2012; 18: 138-141
        • Bacani AK
        • McCollough CH
        • Glazebrook KN
        • Bond JR
        • Michet CJ
        • Milks J
        • et al.
        Dual energy computed tomography for quantification of tissue urate deposits in tophaceous gout: help from modern physics in the management of an ancient disease.
        Rheumatol Int. 2012; 32: 235-239