Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 38, ISSUE 5, P616-620, September 2014

Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced MRI for the assessment of vascularization of hydroxyapatite orbital implants

  • Author Footnotes
    1 The first two authors contributed equally to this study.
    Xu Qi-hua
    Footnotes
    1 The first two authors contributed equally to this study.
    Affiliations
    Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University, Medical College, Jiangyin 214400, Jiangsu, China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 The first two authors contributed equally to this study.
    Zhao Chen
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province People's Hospital), Guangzhou Road No. 300, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China. Tel.: +86-13914175212.
    Footnotes
    1 The first two authors contributed equally to this study.
    Affiliations
    Department of Ophthalmology, Jiangsu Province People's Hospital, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Zhu Jian-gang
    Affiliations
    Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University, Medical College, Jiangyin 214400, Jiangsu, China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Zou Da-zhong
    Affiliations
    Cardiology Department, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin 214400, Jiangsu, China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Zheng Yong-qiang
    Affiliations
    Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Jiangyin Hospital of Southeast University Medical College, Jiangyin 214400, Jiangsu, China
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 The first two authors contributed equally to this study.

      Abstract

      Objective

      To compare contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of vascularization of hydroxyapatite orbital implants.

      Methods

      Ten patients who underwent monthly contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging following implantation were analyzed. The two modalities were compared according to their ability to visualize the progress of vascularization at monthly intervals.

      Results

      There were no differences in the findings shown by these two methods. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound provided better visualization of the dynamic process of vascularization than contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. There were no significant differences in the areas and the time to completion of fibrovascular ingrowth observed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, indicating that the findings of these two examinations were consistently similar.

      Conclusions

      Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is useful for the assessment of vascularization of hydroxyapatite orbital implants and provides better visualization of the dynamic process than contrast-enhanced MRI.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Johnson RL
        • Ramstead CL
        • Nathoo N
        Pegging the porous orbital implant.
        Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 27: 74-75
        • Jordan DR
        • Brownstein S
        • Dorey M
        • Yuen VH
        • Gilberg S
        Fibrovascularization of porous polyethylene (Medpor) orbital implant in a rabbit model.
        Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 20: 136-143
        • Galluzzi P
        • De Francesco S
        • Giacalone G
        • Cerase A
        • Monti L
        • Vallone IM
        • Lazzeretti L
        • Venturi C
        • Hadjistilianou T
        Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of fibrovascular tissue ingrowth within synthetic hydroxyapatite orbital implants in children.
        Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011; 21: 521-528
        • Klapper SR
        • Jordan DR
        • Ells A
        • Grahovac S
        Hydroxyapatite orbital implant vascularization assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
        Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 19: 46-52
        • Numerow LM
        • Kloiber R
        • Mitchell RJ
        • Molnar CP
        • Anderson MA
        Hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Scanning with technetium一99m MDP.
        Clin Nucl Med. 1994; 19: 9-12
        • Egger C
        • Goertz RS
        • Strobel D
        • Lell M
        • Neurath MF
        • Knieling F
        • Scharf M
        Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) for easy and rapid evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (DCE-CT)–a pilot study.
        Ultraschall Med. 2012; 33: 587-592
        • Hornung M
        • Jung EM
        • Georgieva M
        • Schlitt HJ
        • Stroszczynski C
        • Agha A
        Detection of microvascularization of thyroid carcinomas using linear high resolution contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS).
        Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2012; 52: 197-203
        • Iordache S
        • Filip MM
        • Georgescu CV
        • Angelescu C
        • Ciurea T
        • Săftoiu A
        Contrast-enhanced power Doppler endosonography and pathological assessment of vascularization in advanced gastric carcinomas–a feasibility study.
        Med Ultrason. 2012; 14: 101-107
        • Uller W
        • Wiggermann P
        • Gössmann H
        • Klebl F
        • Salzberger B
        • Stroszczynski C
        • Jung EM
        Evaluation of the microcirculation of hepatocellular carcinomas using contrast-enhanced ultrasound with intraarterial and intravenous contrast application during transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE): preliminary data.
        Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2011; 49: 55-66
        • He W
        • Wang LS
        • Li HZ
        • LG Cheng
        • Zhang M
        • Wladyka CG
        Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound in traumatic brain surgery.
        Clin Imaging. 2013; 37: 983-988
        • Rajanna DK
        • Pandey V
        • Janardhan S
        Broad ligament fibroid mimicking as ovarian tumor on ultrasonography and computed tomography scan.
        J Clin Imaging Sci. 2013; 3: 8
        • Thakker MM
        • Fay AM
        • Pieroth L
        • Rubin PA
        Fibrovascular ingrowth into hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene orbital implants wrapped with acellular dermi.
        Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 20: 368-373
        • Hamilton HE
        • Christianson MD
        • Williams JP
        • Thomas RA
        Evaluation of vascularization of coralline hydroxyapatite ocular implants by magnetic resonance imaging.
        Clin Imaging. 1992; 16: 243-246
        • Civelek AC
        • Pacheco EM
        • Natarajan TK
        • Wagner Jr., HN
        • Iliff NT
        Quantitative measurement of vascularization and vascular ingrowth rate of coralline hydroxyapatite ocular implant by Tc-99 m MDP bone imaging.
        Clin Nucl Med. 1995; 20: 779-787
        • Thakker MM
        • Zhang J
        • Sires BS
        Chronic inflammation from polycarbonate motility peg inhibits osteogenesis in a humanhydroxyapatite orbital implant.
        Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 21: 399-401
        • Jordan DR
        • Gilberg S
        • Bawazeer A
        Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (bio-eye): experience with 158 patients.
        Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 20: 69-74
        • Liao SL
        • Chen MS
        • Lin LL
        Primary placement of a titanium sleeve in hydroxyapatite orbital implants.
        Eye (Lond). 2005; 19: 400-405
        • Müller HF
        • Viaccoz A
        • Kuzmanovic I
        • Bonvin C
        • Burkhardt K
        • Bochaton-Piallat ML
        • Sztajzel R
        Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of carotid plaque neo-vascularization: accuracy of visual analysis.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014; 40: 18-24
        • Mouterde G
        • Aegerter P
        • Correas JM
        • Breban M
        • D'Agostino MA
        Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the detection and quantification of enthesitis vascularization in patients with spondyloarthritis.
        Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014; 66: 131-138
        • Ferrara KW
        • Merritt CR
        • Burns PN
        • Foster FS
        • Mattrey RF
        • Wickline SA
        Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with US: imaging, Doppler, and contrast agents.
        Acad Radiol. 2000; 7: 824-839
        • Schwarz KQ
        • Chen X
        • Bezante GP
        • Phillips D
        • Schlief R
        The Doppler kinetics of microbubble echo contrast.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 1996; 22: 453-462
        • Shiyan L
        • Pintong H
        • Zongmin W
        • Fuguang H
        • Zhiqiang Z
        • Yan Y
        • Cosgrove D
        The relationship between enhanced intensity and microvessel density of gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
        UItrasound Med Biol. 2009; 35: 1086-1091
        • Derchi LE
        • Martinoli C
        • Pretolesi F
        • Crespi G
        • Buccicardi D
        Quantitative analysis of contrast enhancement.
        Eur Radiol. 1999; 9: $372-$376
        • Jamell GA
        • Hollsten DA
        • Hawes MJ
        • Griffin DJ
        • Klingensmith WC
        • White WL
        • Spirnak J
        Magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scan for assessment of vascularization of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant.
        Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 12: 127-130
        • De Potter P
        • Shields CL
        • Shields JA
        • Flanders AE
        • Rao VM
        Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant.
        Ophthalmology. 1992; 99: 824-830