Advertisement

Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems

Published:December 07, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2011.09.006

      Abstract

      We studied the performance of three computed radiography and three direct radiography systems with regard to the image noise and entrance skin dose based on a chest phantom. Images were obtained with kVp of 100, 110, and 120 and mA settings of 1, 2, 4, 8, and 10. Significant differences of image noise were found in these digital chest radiography systems (P<.0001). Standard deviation was significantly different when the mAs were changed (P<.001), but it was independent of the kVp values (P=.08–.85). Up to 44% of radiation dose could be saved when kVp was reduced from 120 to 100 kVp without compromising image quality.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Veldkamp WJ
        • Kroft LJ
        • Geleijns J
        Dose and perceived image quality in chest radiography.
        Eur J Radiol. 2009; 72: 209-217
        • Teeuwisse W
        • Geleijns J
        • Veldkamp WJ
        An inter-hospital comparison of patient dose based on clinical indications.
        Eur Radiol. 2007; 17: 1795-1805
        • McAdams HP
        • Samei E
        • Dobbins J
        • Tourassi GD
        • Ravin CE
        Recent advances in chest radiography.
        Radiology. 2006; 241: 5663-5683
        • Daffner R
        Clinical radiology, the essentials.
        2nd ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore1999
        • Chotas HG
        • Dobbins J
        • Ravin CE
        Principles of digital radiography with large-area electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics.
        Radiology. 1999; 210: 595-599
        • Veldkamp WJ
        • Kroft LJ
        • van Delft JP
        • Geleijns J
        A technique for simulating the effect of dose reduction on image quality in digital chest radiography.
        J Digit Imag. 2009; 22: 114-125
        • Bernhardt TM
        • Rapp-Bernhardt U
        • Lenzen H
        • Rohl FW
        • Diederich S
        • Papke K
        • et al.
        Diagnostic performance of a flat-panel detector at low tube voltage in chest radiography: a phantom study.
        Invest Radiol. 2004; 39: 97-103
        • Uffmann M
        • Neitzel U
        • Prokop M
        • Kabalan N
        • Weber M
        • Herold CJ
        • et al.
        Flat-panel detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality.
        Radiology. 2005; 235: 642-650
        • Bath M
        • Hakansson M
        • Tingberg A
        • Mansson LG
        Method of simulating dose reduction for digital radiographic systems.
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2005; 114: 253-259
        • Dobbins JT
        • Samei E
        • Chotas HG
        • Warp RJ
        • Baydush AH
        • Floyd CE
        • et al.
        Chest radiography: optimization of x-ray spectrum for cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
        Radiology. 2003; 226: 221-230
        • Kroft LJ
        • Veldkamp WJ
        • Mertens BJ
        • Boot MV
        • Geleijns J
        Comparison of eight different digital chest radiography systems: variation in detection of simulated chest disease.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185: 339-346
        • Uffmann M
        • Prokop M
        • Eisenhuber E
        • Fuchsjager M
        • Weber M
        • Schaefer-Prokop C
        Computed radiography and direct radiography: influence of acquisition dose on the detection of simulated lung lesions.
        Invest Radiol. 2005; 40: 249-256
        • Ramli K
        • Abdullah BJJ
        • Ng KH
        • Mahmud R
        • Hussain AF
        Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
        Australasian Radiol. 2005; 49: 460-466
        • Sun Z
        • Winder RJ
        • Kelly BE
        • Ellis PK
        • Kennedy PT
        • Hirst DG
        Assessment of VIE image quality using helical CT angiography: in vitro phantom study.
        Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2004; 28: 3-12
        • European Commission
        European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images, EUR 16260.
        European Commission, Luxembourg1996
        • Vano E
        ICRP recommendations on “managing patient dose in digital radiology” (invited paper).
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2005; 114: 126-130
        • Busch HP
        • Faulkner K
        Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimization.
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2005; 117: 143-147
        • Schaefer-Prokop C
        • Neitzel U
        • Venema HW
        • Uffman M
        • Prokop M
        Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality.
        Eur Radiol. 2008; 18: 1818-1830
        • Redlich U
        • Hoeschen C
        • Effenberger O
        • Fessel A
        • Preuss H
        • Reissberg S
        • et al.
        Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image quality for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization.
        ROFO. 2005; 177: 272-278
        • Gruber M
        • Uffmann M
        • Weber M
        • Prokop M
        • Balassy C
        • Schaefer-Prokop C
        Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.
        Eur Radiol. 2006; 16: 1544-1550
        • De Hauwere A
        • Bacher K
        • Smeets P
        • Verstraete K
        • Thierens H
        Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2005; 117: 174-177
        • Uffmann M
        • Schaefer-Prokop C
        Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose.
        Eur J Radiol. 2009; 72: 202-208
        • Kroft LJM
        • Veldkamp WJH
        • Mertens BJA
        • van Delft JPA
        • Geleijns J
        Dose reduction in digital chest radiography and perceived image quality.
        Br J Radiol. 2007; 80: 984-988
        • Kroft LJ
        • Veldkamp WJ
        • Mertens BJ
        • van Delft JJP
        • Geleijns J
        Detection of simulated nodules on clinical radiographs: dose reduction at digital posteroanterior chest radiography.
        Radiology. 2006; 241: 392-398
        • Metz S
        • Damoser P
        • Hollweck R
        • Roggel R
        • Engelke C
        • Woertler K
        • et al.
        Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis.
        Radiology. 2005; 234: 776-784
        • Geijer H
        • Beckman KW
        • Anderson T
        • Pers liden J
        Image quality versus radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.
        Eur Radiol. 2001; 11: 1704-1709
        • Garmer M
        • Hennigs SP
        • Jager HJ
        • Schrick F
        • van de Loo T
        • Jacobs A
        • et al.
        Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174: 75-80
        • Pascoal A
        • Lawinski CP
        • Mackenzie A
        • Tabakov S
        • Lewis CA
        Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
        Radiat Prot Dosim. 2005; 114: 273-277