Advertisement

Siliconomas mimicking cancer

Published:September 01, 2010DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.07.006

      Abstract

      Introduction

      Silicone breast implants are widely used for breast augmentation and breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Implant rupture has specific radiological signs. With the advent use of new imaging technique such as positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast, these signs may simulate malignancy.

      Patients and methods

      We retrospectively reviewed four cases of patients with silicon breast implants who arrive to the mammography clinic for further evaluation of a suspected malignant process demonstrated on either PET CT or breast MRI.

      Results

      Two cases were of PET CT performed for routine oncology follow-up of breast cancer. On both, the PET CT demonstrated multiple-spread benign silicone granulomas manifesting as multiple masses having an increase fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake. One case of a new mass was demonstrated as a suspicious mass on the dynamic sequences on MRI of the breast. Ultrasound-guided biopsy demonstrated benign tissue response to silicone. One case demonstrated bilateral ruptured breast implants on breast MRI, as well as bilateral axillary and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Eventually, the patient underwent bronchoscopy for pulmonary workup of dry cough, revealing sarcoidosis.

      Conclusion

      Silicone granulomas can manifest as masses with suspicious morphology and enhancement dynamics on breast MRI or with increased FDG uptake on PET CT. The presence of silicone implants and awareness of the possibility of a rupture and formation of silicone granulomas may help in facilitating a correct diagnosis.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Puckett CL
        On the safety of silicone gel implants.
        Cancer Invest. 2000; 18: 278-280
        • Lykissa ED
        • Kala SV
        Release of low molecular weight silicones and platin.
        Anal Chem. 1997; 69: 4912-4916
        • Ikeda DM
        • Borofsky HB
        • Herfkens RJ
        • Sawyer-Glover A
        • Birdwell RL
        • Glover GH
        • et al.
        Silicone breast implant rupture: pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 2054-2062
        • Berg WA
        • Anderson ND
        • Zerhouni EA
        • Chang BW
        • Kuhlman JE
        Single- and double-lumen silicone breast implant integrity: prospective evaluation of MR and US criteria.
        Radiology. 1995; 197: 45-52
        • Garrido L
        • Pfleiderer B
        • Papisov M
        • Ackerman JL
        In vivo degradation of silicones.
        Mag Reson Med. 1993; 29: 839-843
        • Puckett MA
        • Defriend D
        • Williams MP
        • Roobottom CA
        A leaking breast prosthesis presenting as an abdominal mass.
        Br J Radiol. 2004; 77: 790-791
        • Stavros T
        Breast ultrasound. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2004: 199-275
        • Mund DF
        • Farnia DM
        • Gorczyca DP
        • DeBruhl ND
        • Ahn CY
        • Shaw WW
        • et al.
        MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone-gel implants: spectrum of findings.
        Am J Radiol. 1993; 161: 773-778
        • Rosenbaum SJ
        • Lind T
        • Antoch G
        • Bockisch A
        False-positive FDG PET uptake — the role of PET.
        Eur Radiol. 2006; 16: 1054-1065
        • Katzin W
        • Centeno J
        • Feng LJ
        • Kiley M
        • Mullick FG
        Pathology of lymph nodes from patients with breast implants: a histologic and spectroscopic evaluation.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2005; 29: 506-511