Advertisement

Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 320-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To compare image quality and patient radiation dose in a group of patients who underwent 320-detector computed tomography coronary angiography performed with prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) gating with image quality and radiation dose in a group of patients matched for clinical features who underwent 320-detector computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography performed with retrospective ECG gating.

      Materials and Methods

      This study was approved by our institutional human research committee. All patients had clinical indications for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Two independent reviewers separately scored coronary artery segment image quality for 480 cardiac CT studies in prospective group and retrospective group (240 in each group). Reviewer variability was calculated. Estimated effective radiation dose was compared for prospective versus retrospective ECG gating.

      Results

      The two groups matched well for clinical characteristics and CT parameters. There was good agreement for coronary artery segment image quality scores between the independent reviewers (k=0.73). Of the 6408 coronary artery segments scored, there were no coronary artery segments that could not be evaluated in each group. Image quality scores were not significantly different (P>.05). Mean patient radiation dose was 76.50% lower for prospective gating (4.2 mSv) than for retrospective gating (18.1 mSv) (P<.01).

      Conclusion

      Use of 320-detector CT coronary angiography performed with prospective ECG gating has similar subjective image quality scores but 76.50% lower patient radiation dose when compared with use of retrospective ECG gating.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hsieh J
        • Londt J
        • Vass M
        • Li J
        • Tang X
        • Okerlund D
        Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography.
        Med Phys. 2006; 33: 4236-4248
        • Austen WG
        • Edwards JE
        • Frye RL
        • Gensini GG
        • Gott VL
        • Griffith LS
        • et al.
        A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 1975; 51: 5-40
        • Brodoefel H
        • Reimann A
        • Burgstahler C
        • Schumacher F
        • Herberts T
        • Tsiflikas I
        • et al.
        Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy.
        Eur J Radiol. 2008; 66: 134-141
        • Matt D
        • Scheffel H
        • Leschka S
        • Flohr TG
        • Marincek B
        • Kaufmann PA
        • et al.
        Dualsource CT coronary angiography: image quality, mean heart rate, and heart rate variability.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189: 567-573
        • Bongartz G
        • Golding SJ
        • Jurik AJ
        European guidelines for multislice computed tomography: report EUR 16262 EN 2004.
        European Commission, Luxembourg2004
        • Shuman WP
        • Branch KR
        • May JM
        • Mitsumori LM
        • Lockhart DW
        • Dubinsky TJ
        • et al.
        Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose.
        Radiology. 2008; 248: 431-437
        • d'Agostino AG
        • Remy-Jardin M
        • Khalil C
        • Delannoy-Deken V
        • Flohr T
        • Duhamel A
        • et al.
        Low-dose ECG-gated 64-slices helical CT angiography of the chest: evaluation of image quality in 105 patients.
        Eur Radiol. 2006; 16: 2137-2146
        • Mori S
        • Nishizawa K
        • Kondo C
        • Ohno M
        • Akahane K
        • Endo M
        Effective doses in subjects undergoing computed tomography cardiac imaging with the 256-multislice CT scanner.
        Eur J Radiol. 2007; 65: 442-448
        • Qin J
        • Liu LY
        • Meng XC
        • Zhu KS
        • He KK
        • Qian XX
        • et al.
        Initial clinical application on coronary images of 320-slice dynamic volume MDCT.
        Chin J Med Imaging Technol (Chin). 2009; 25: 127-130
        • Rybicki FJ
        • Otero HJ
        • Steigner ML
        • Vorobiof G
        • Nallamshetty L
        • Mitsouras D
        • et al.
        Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography.
        Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008; 24: 535-546
        • Steigner ML
        • Otero HJ
        • Cai T
        • Mitsouras D
        • Nallamshetty L
        • Whitmore AG
        • et al.
        Narrowing the phase window width in prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row coronary CT angiography.
        Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009; 25: 85-90