Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 34, ISSUE 6, P432-440, November 2010

Download started.

Ok

Diffusion-weighted MRI with parallel imaging technique: apparent diffusion coefficient determination in normal kidneys and in nonmalignant renal diseases

Published:November 23, 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.09.007

      Abstract

      The purpose of the study was to assess the capability and the reliability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in the evaluation of different benign renal abnormalities. Twenty-five healthy volunteers and 31 patients, divided into seven different groups (A–G) according to pathology, underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW MRI) of the kidneys using 1.5-T system. DW images were obtained in the axial plane with a spin-echo echo planar imaging single-shot sequence with three b values (0, 300, and 600 s/mm2). Before acquisition of DW sequences, we performed in each patient a morphological study of the kidneys. ADC was 2.40±0.20×10−3 mm2 s−1 in volunteers. A significant difference was found between Groups A (cysts=3.39±0.51×10−3 mm2 s−1) and B (acute/chronic renal failure=1.38±0.40×10−3 mm2 s−1) and between Groups A and C (chronic pyelonephritis=1.53±0.21×10−3 mm2 s−1) (P<.05). An important difference was also observed among Group D (hydronephrosis=4.82±0.35×10−3 mm2 s−1) and Groups A, B, and C (P<.05), whereas no differences were found between Groups B and C (P>.05). A considerable correlation between glomerular filtration rate and ADC was found (P=.04). In conclusion, significant differences were detected among different patient groups, and this suggests that ADC measurements can be useful in differentiating normal renal parenchyma from most commonly encountered nonmalignant renal lesions.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wesbey GE
        • Moseley ME
        • Ehman RL
        Translational molecular self-diffusion in magnetic resonance imaging. II. Measurement of the self-diffusion coefficient.
        Invest Radiol. 1984; 19: 491-498
        • Le Bihan D
        • Breton E
        • Lallemand D
        • Aubin ML
        • Vignaud J
        • Laval-Jeantet M
        Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.
        Radiology. 1988; 168: 497-505
        • Yoshikawa K
        • Nakata Y
        • Yamada K
        • Nakagawa M
        Early pathological changes in the parkinsonian brain demonstrated by diffusion tensor MRI.
        J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004; 75: 481-484
        • Eastwood JD
        • Lev MH
        • Wintermark M
        • Fitzek C
        • Barboriak DP
        • Delong DM
        • Lee TY
        • Azhari T
        • Herzau M
        • Chilukuri VR
        • Provenzale JM
        Correlation of early dynamic CT perfusion imaging with whole-brain MR diffusion and perfusion imaging in acute hemispheric stroke.
        Am J Neuroradiol. 2003; 24: 1869-1875
        • Namimoto T
        • Yamashita Y
        • Mitsuzaki K
        • Nakayama Y
        • Tang Y
        • Takahashi M
        Measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in diffuse renal disease by diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999; 9: 832-837
        • Fukuda Y
        • Ohashi I
        • Hanafusa K
        • Nakagawa T
        • Ohtani S
        • An-naka Y
        • Hayashi T
        • Shibuya H
        Anisotropic diffusion in kidney: apparent diffusion coefficient measurements for clinical use.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 11: 156-160
        • Toyoshima S
        • Noguchi K
        • Seto H
        • Shimizu M
        • Watanabe N
        Functional evaluation of hydronephrosis by diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
        Acta Radiol. 2000; 41: 642-646
        • Chan JH
        • Tsui EY
        • Luk SH
        • Fung SL
        • Cheung YK
        • Chan MS
        • Yuen MK
        • Mak SF
        • Wong KP
        MR diffusion-weighted imaging of kidney: differentiation between hydronephrosis and pyonephrosis.
        Clin Imaging. 2001; 25: 110-113
        • Verswijvel G
        • Vandecaveye V
        • Gelin G
        • Vandevenne J
        • Grieten M
        • Horvath M
        • Oyen R
        • Palmers Y
        Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of renal infection: preliminary results.
        JBR-BTR. 2002; 85: 100-103
        • Mc Cullough PA
        Beyond serum creatinine: defining the patient with renal insufficiency and why?.
        Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2003; 4: S2-S6
        • Cova M
        • Squillaci E
        • Stacul F
        • Manenti G
        • Gava S
        • Simonetti G
        • Pozzi-Mucelli R
        Diffusion-weighted MRI in the evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary results.
        Br J Radiol. 2004; 77: 851-857
        • Le Bihan D
        • Breton E
        • Lallemand D
        • Grenier P
        • Cabanis E
        • Laval-Jeantet M
        MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: applications to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorder.
        Radiology. 1986; 161: 401-407
        • Le Bihan D
        Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
        Magn Reson Q. 1991; 7: 1-30
        • Laissy JP
        • Menegazzo D
        • Dumont E
        • Piekarski JD
        • Karila-Cohen P
        • Chillon S
        • Schouman-Claeys E
        Hemodynamic effect of iodinated high-viscosity contrast medium in the rat kidney.
        Invest Radiol. 2000; 35: 647-652
        • Muller MF
        • Prasad PV
        • Bimmler D
        • Kaiser A
        • Edelman RR
        Functional imaging of the kidney by means of measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
        Radiology. 1994; 193: 711-715
        • Vallée JP
        • Lazeyras F
        • Khan HG
        • Terrier F
        Absolute renal blood flow quantification by dynamic MRI and Gd-DTPA.
        Eur Radiol. 2000; 10: 1245-1252
        • Colagrande S
        • Belli G
        • Politi LS
        • Mannelli L
        • Pasquinelli F
        • Villari N
        The influence of diffusion- and relaxation-related factors on signal intensity: an introductive guide to magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging studies.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008; 32: 463-474
        • Muller MF
        • Prasad PV
        • Siewert B
        • Nissenbaum MA
        • Raptopoulos V
        • Edelman RR
        Abdominal diffusion mapping with use of a whole-body echo-planar system.
        Radiology. 1994; 190: 475-478
        • Mürtz P
        • Flacke S
        • Träber F
        • van den Brink JS
        • Gieseke J
        • Schild HH
        Abdomen: diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pulse-triggered single-shot sequences.
        Radiology. 2002; 224: 258-264
        • Carbone SF
        • Gaggioli E
        • Ricci V
        • Mazzei F
        • Mazzei MA
        • Volterrani L
        Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of renal function: a preliminary study.
        Radiol Med (Torino). 2007; 112: 1201-1210
        • Siegel CL
        • Aisen AM
        • Ellis JH
        • Londy F
        • Chenevert TL
        Feasibility of MR diffusion studies in the kidney.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 1995; 5: 617-620
        • Grenier N
        • Basseau F
        • Ries M
        • Tyndal B
        • Jones R
        • Moonen C
        Functional MRI of the kidney.
        Abdom Imaging. 2003; 28: 164-175
        • Hellerstein S
        • Alon U
        • Warady B
        Creatinine for estimation of glomerular filtration rate.
        Pediatr Nephrol. 1992; 6: 507-511
        • Gaspari F
        • Perico N
        • Remuzzi G
        Measurement of glomerular filtration rate.
        Kidney Int. 1997; 63: 151-154
        • O'Reilly PH
        • Brooman PJC
        • Martin PJ
        • Pollard AJ
        • Farah NB
        • Mason GC
        Accuracy and reproducibility of a new contrast clearance method for the determination of glomerular filtration rate.
        Br Med J. 1986; 293: 234-236
        • De Santo NG
        • Coppola S
        • Anastasio P
        • Coscarella G
        • Capasso G
        • Bellini L
        Predicted creatinine clearance to assess glomerular filtration rate in chronic renal disease in humans.
        Am J Nephrol. 1991; 11: 181-185
        • Walser M
        • Drew HH
        • Guldan JL
        Prediction of glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine concentration from in advanced chronic renal failure.
        Kidney Int. 1993; 44: 1145-1148
        • Stinton TJ
        • De Leacy EA
        • Cowely DM
        Comparison of 51CrEDTA clearance with formulae in the measurement of glomerular filtration rate.
        Pathology. 1986; 18: 445-447