MR and CT techniques optimized for small bowel imaging are playing an increasing role
in the evaluation of small bowel disorders. Several studies have shown the advantage
of these techniques over traditional barium fluoroscopic examinations secondary to
improvements in spatial and temporal resolution combined with improved bowel distending
agents. The preference of MR vs. CT has been geographical and based on expertise and
public policy. With the increasing awareness of radiation exposure, there has been
a more global interest in implementing techniques that either reduce or eliminate
radiation exposure [Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source
of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277–84]. This is especially important in patients with chronic diseases
such as inflammatory bowel disease who may require multiple studies over a lifetime
or in studies that require sequential imaging time points such as in the assessment
of gastrointestinal motility [Froehlich JM, Patak MA, von Weymarn C, Juli CF, Zollikofer
CL, Wentz KU. Small bowel motility assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:370–75]. A recent study showed that certain subgroups of patients with Crohn's
disease may be exposed to higher doses of radiation: those diagnosed at an early age
and those with upper tract inflammation, penetrating disease, requirement of intravenous
steroids, infliximab, or multiple surgeries [Desmond AN, O'Regan K, Curran C, et al.
Crohn's disease: factors associated with exposure to high levels of diagnostic radiation.
Gut 2008;57:1524–29]. Therefore it has been suggested that techniques that can reduce
or eliminate radiation exposure should be considered for imaging [Brenner DJ, Hall
EJ, op. cit.]. Owing to the excellent soft tissue contrast, direct multiplanar imaging
capabilities, new ultrafast breath-holding pulse sequences, lack of ionizing radiation,
and availability of a variety of oral contrast agents, MR is well suited to play a
critical role in the imaging of small bowel disorders. In this article, we will review
the technical issues related to the performance of MR enterography and enteroclysis
and discuss the role and controversies of using MR in the assessment of inflammatory
bowel disease.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Clinical ImagingAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc.