Advertisement

Contrast behavior and image quality of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography imaging using variable echo times at 3.0 T

      Abstract

      Twenty-five volunteers were examined at three different echo times (TE) using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) images obtained with half-Fourier-acquired single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) thick-slab and multislice HASTE to identify the optimal TE at 3.0 T. No significant difference in the overall image quality was found comparing three different TEs within commonly used ranges. We observed an almost identical duct visibility with different TEs, while we found a trend toward superior visibility of the cystic duct at shorter TE.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Barker PB
        • Hearshen DO
        • Boska MD
        Single-voxel proton MRS of the human brain at 1.5 T and 3.0 T.
        Magn Reson Med. 2001; 45: 765-769
        • Kuhl CK
        • Textor J
        • Gieseke J
        • von Falkenhausen M
        • Gernert S
        • Urbach H
        • et al.
        Acute and subacute ischemic stroke at high-field-strength (3.0-T) diffusion-weighted MR imaging: intraindividual comparative study.
        Radiology. 2005; 234: 509-516
        • Gutberlet M.
        • Spors B
        • Grothoff M
        • Freyhardt P
        • Schwinge K
        • Plotkin M
        • et al.
        Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D cine magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T.
        Eur Radiol. 2005; 15: 1586-1597
        • von Falkenhausen MM
        • Lutterbey G
        • Morakkabati-Spitz N
        • Walter O
        • Gieseke J
        • Blomer R
        • et al.
        High-field-strength MR imaging of the liver at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR imaging at 1.5 T.
        Radiology. 2006; 241: 156-166
        • Schick F
        Whole-body MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential.
        Eur Radiol. 2005; 15: 946-959
        • O'Regan DP
        • Fitzgerald J
        • Allsop J
        • Gibson D
        • Larkman DJ
        • Cokkinos D
        • et al.
        A comparison of MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 and 3.0 T.
        Br J Radiol. 2005; 78: 894-898
        • Merkle EM
        • Haugan PA
        • Thomas J
        • Jaffe TA
        • Gullotto C
        3.0- versus 1.5-T MR cholangiography: a pilot study.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 186: 516-521
        • Isoda H
        • Kataoka M
        • Maetani Y
        • Kido A
        • Umeoka S
        • Tamai K
        • et al.
        MRCP imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T: preliminary experience in healthy volunteers.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007; 25: 1000-1006
        • Bottomley PA
        • Foster TH
        • Argerisiger RE
        • Pfeifer LM
        A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1–100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision and age.
        Med Phys. 1984; 11: 425-448
        • Gold GE
        • Han E
        • Stainsby J
        • Wright G
        • Brittain J
        • Beaulieu C
        Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 183: 343-351
        • de Bazelaire CM
        • Duhamel GD
        • Rofsky NM
        • Alsop DC
        MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results.
        Radiology. 2004; 230: 652-659
        • Morakkabati-Spitz N
        • Gieseke J
        • Kuhl C
        • Lutterbey G
        • von Falkenhausen M
        • Traber F
        • et al.
        MRI of the pelvis at 3 T: very high spatial resolution with sensitivity encoding and flip-angle sweep technique in clinically acceptable scan time.
        Eur Radiol. 2006; 16: 634-641