The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of men presenting with clinical
breast problems for breast imaging and to evaluate the role of mammography and ultrasound
in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast problems. We retrospectively reviewed
clinical, radiographic, and pathologic records of 165 consecutive symptomatic men
presenting to breast imaging over a 4-year period. We assessed the clinical indication
for referral, mammographic findings, sonographic findings, histologic results, and
clinical outcomes. Patients ranged in age from 22 to 96 years. Breast Imaging Reporting
and Data System Category 4 and 5 mammograms and solid sonographic masses were considered
suspicious for malignancy. Six of 165 men (4%) had primary breast carcinoma, which
were mammographically suspicious in all 6 (100%). Five were invasive ductal carcinoma
and one was ductal carcinoma in situ. Of 164 mammograms, 20 (12%) were suspicious.
Six were cancerous and 14 were benign. Clinical follow-up for 2 years or biopsy results
were available for 138 of the 165 men (84%). Twelve with benign mammographic findings
had benign biopsies. All men with benign mammography not undergoing biopsy were cancer
free. Sensitivity for cancer detection (mammography) was 100% and specificity was
90%. Positive predictive value (mammography) was 32% (6 of 19), and the negative predictive
value was 100%. Sonography was performed in 68 of the 165 men (41%). Three of three
cancers (100%) were solid sonographic masses. There were 9 of 68 false-positive examinations
(13%). Sensitivity and negative predictive value for cancer detection (ultrasound)
was 100% and specificity was 74%. The most common clinical indication for referral
was mass/thickening (56%). Mammography had excellent sensitivity and specificity for
breast cancer detection and should be included as the initial imaging examination
of men with clinical breast problems. The negative predictive value of 100% for mammography
suggests that mammograms read as normal or negative need no further examination if
the clinical findings are not suspicious. A normal ultrasound in these men confirms
the negative predictive value of a normal mammogram.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Clinical ImagingAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Publication history
Published online: January 22, 2007
Identification
Copyright
© 2007 Published by Elsevier Inc.