Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the standard of care for nodal staging of
patients with invasive breast cancer. Due to significant somatic and psychological
side effects, replacement of ALND with less invasive techniques is desirable. The
goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of axillary lymph node
(ALN) staging by means of positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in breast cancer patients qualifying for sentinel lymph
node biopsy (SLNB). FDG-PET was performed within 1 week before surgery in 24 clinically
node-negative breast cancer patients with tumors smaller than 3 cm. Sentinel lymph
nodes (SLNs) were identified by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy following peritumoral
technetium 99-m labeled colloid albumin injection, and by intraoperative gamma detector
and blue dye localization. Following SLNB, a standard ALND was performed. Serial sectioning
and immunohistochemistry of the SLN, as well as standard histologic examination of
the non-SLN, was performed. FDG-PET detected all primary breast cancers. The staging
of ALNs by PET was accurate in 15 of 24 patients (62.5%), whereas PET staging was
false negative in 8 of 10 node-positive patients and false positive in 1 patient.
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value
of FDG-PET for nodal status was 20% 93%, 67%, and 62%, respectively. The mean diameter
of false-negative ALN metastases was 7.5 mm (range 1–15 mm). Lymph node staging using
FDG-PET is not accurate enough in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer
qualifying for SLNB and should not be used for this purpose.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Clinical ImagingAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Publication history
Published online: August 19, 2004
Breast J 2004;10:89–93Identification
Copyright
© 2004 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.