Advertisement

Computed tomography findings of peritoneal tuberculosis

Systematic review of seven patients diagnosed in 6 years (1996–2001)

      Abstract

      Objective

      The aim of this study was to describe the computed tomography (CT) findings in patients with demonstrated peritoneal tuberculosis (TB) and their concordance with the three types from the traditional classification (wet, fibrotic, and dry plastic).

      Methods

      We reviewed the CT images of all patients with microbiologically proven peritoneal tuberculosis over a 6-year period (1996–2001).

      Results

      Seven patients were included. Ascites was present in 5 patients (free ascites in 3 patients and loculated in 2). Involvement of the mesentery was found in 5 patients, the omentum in 4, and the parietal peritoneum in 3. Tuberculous lymphadenitis was the most common associated finding (6 patients). Two patients had hepatic lesions. The fibrotic type was found in all the patients, and 5 patients had an association of the fibrotic and wet types. None of the patients had lesions consistent with the dry plastic type.

      Conclusion

      Peritoneal tuberculosis is best described as a combination of ascites, peritoneal lesions, and lymphadenopathy, rather than the three types from the traditional classification.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ahmed A
        • Pereira SP
        • Steger A
        • Starke I
        Abdominal tuberculosis: the great mimic.
        Hosp Med. 2001; 62: 368-369
        • Mehta JB
        • Dutt A
        • Harvill L
        • Mathews KM
        Epidemiology of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. A comparative analysis with pre-AIDS era.
        Chest. 1991; 99: 1134-1138
        • Zissin R
        • Gayer G
        • Chowers M
        • Shapiro M
        • Kots E
        • Hertz M
        Computerized tomography findings of abdominal tuberculosis: report of 19 cases.
        Isr Med Assoc J. 2001; 3: 416-418
        • Leder RA
        • Low VHS
        Tuberculosis of the abdomen.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 1995; 33: 691-705
        • Hiller N
        • Lioubashevsky N
        Tuberculosis peritonitis; a diagnostic challenge.
        Abdominal Imaging. 2001; 26: 319-322
        • Denton P
        • Hossain J
        A radiological study of abdominal tuberculosis in a Saudi population with special reference to ultrasound and computed tomography.
        Clin Radiol. 1993; 47: 409-414
        • Jadvar H
        • Mindelzum RE
        • Olcott EV
        • Levitt DB
        Still the great mimmicker: abdominal tuberculosis.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168: 1455-1460
        • Akhan O
        • Pringot J
        Imaging of abdominal tuberculosis.
        Eur Radiol. 2002; 12: 312-323
        • Ha HK
        • Jung JI
        • Lee MS
        • Choi BG
        • Lee MG
        • Kim YH
        • Kim PN
        • Auh YH
        CT differentiation of tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 167: 743-748
        • Suri S
        • Gupta S
        • Suri R
        Computed tomography in abdominal tuberculosis.
        Br J Radiol. 1999; 72: 92-98
        • Lundstedt C
        • Nyman R
        • Brismar J
        • Hugossen C
        • Kavegi I
        Imaging of tuberculosis. Abdominal manifestations in 112 patients.
        Acta Radiol. 1996; 37: 489-495
        • Engin G
        • Acunus B
        • Acunus G
        • Tunaci M
        Imaging of extrapulmonary tuberculosis.
        Radiographics. 2000; 20: 471-488