Research Article| Volume 28, ISSUE 5, P329-333, September 2004

Download started.


CT evaluation of gastrointestinal tract perforation


      The purpose of this study is to review the computed tomography (CT) appearance of gastrointestinal tract (GI) perforation. Forty-two patients with 10 cases of proximal GI perforation and 32 cases of distal GI perforation were evaluated based on the CT findings of extraluminal air (which was subdivided into the CT-falciform ligament sign crossing the midline and scattered pockets of air), bowel wall thickening (>8 mm in gastroduodenal wall, >3 mm in the small bowel wall, >6 mm in the caliber of the appendix and >5 mm in the colonic wall), associated abscess formation, ascites and adjacent fat stranding. The results were compared using Fisher's Exact Test. Detection of extraluminal air in the upright plain films and CT was analyzed by Z test. Our results showed that CT-falciform ligament sign was more frequent in the proximal GI perforation, while pockets of extraluminal air (excluding the cases accompanying CT-falciform ligament sign), bowel wall thickening and fat stranding were found in higher incidence in distal GI perforation (P<.05). CT detected extraluminal air in more cases than the upright plain films did (69% vs. 19%; Z=4.62>Z0.01=2.326). We concluded that CT is a good imaging tool to differentiate the various GI perforations.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Stapakis JC
        • Thickman D
        Diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum: abdominal CT vs. upright chest film.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992; 16: 713-716
        • Ghahremani GG
        Radiologic evaluation of suspected gastrointestinal perforations.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 1993; 31: 1219-1234
        • Cho KC
        • Baker SR
        Extraluminal air: diagnosis and significance.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 1994; 32: 829-839
        • Maniatis V
        • Chryssikopoulos H
        • Roussakis A
        • Kalamara C
        • Papadopoulos A
        • Andreou J
        • Stringaris K
        Perforation of the alimentary tract: evaluation with computed tomography.
        Abdom Imaging. 2000; 25: 373-379
        • Chen CH
        • Huang HS
        • Yang CC
        • Yeh YH
        Features of perforated peptic ulcers in conventional computed tomography.
        Hepato-Gastroenterol. 2001; 48: 1393-1396
        • Ongolo-Zogo P
        • Borson O
        • Garcia P
        • Grune L
        • Valette P
        Acute gastroduodenal peptic ulcer perforation: contrast-enhanced and thin-section spiral CT findings in 10 patients.
        Abdom Imaging. 1999; 24: 329-332
        • Fultz PJ
        • Skucas J
        • Weiss SL
        CT in upper gastrointestinal tract perforations secondary to peptic ulcer disease.
        Gastrointest Radiol. 1992; 17: 5-8
        • Jacobs JM
        • Hill MC
        • Steinberg WM
        Peptic ulcer disease: CT evaluation.
        Radiology. 1991; 178: 745-748
        • Sherck J
        • Shatney C
        • Sensaki K
        • Selivanov V
        The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of blunt small-bowel perforation.
        Am J Surg. 1994; 168: 670-675
        • Gonzalez JG
        • Gonzalez RR
        • Patino JV
        • Garcia AT
        • Alvarez CP
        • Pedrosa CA
        CT findings in gastrointestinal perforation by ingested fish bones.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1988; 12: 88-90
        • Rao PM
        • Rhea JT
        • Novelline RA
        • McCabe CJ
        • Lawrason JN
        • Berger DL
        • Sacknoff R
        Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination.
        Radiology. 1997; 202: 139-144
        • Horrow MM
        • White DS
        • Horrow JC
        Differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis at CT.
        Radiology. 2003; 227: 46-51
        • Oliak D
        • Sinow R
        • French S
        • Udani VM
        • Stamos MJ
        Computed tomography scanning for the diagnosis of perforated appendicitis.
        Am Surgeon. 1999; 65: 959-964
        • Hulnick DH
        • Megibow AJ
        • Balthazar EJ
        • Gordon RB
        • Surapenini R
        • Bosniak MA
        Perforated colorectal neoplasms: correlation of clinical, contrast enema, and CT examinations.
        Radiology. 1987; 164: 611-615
        • Gayer G
        • Zissin R
        • Apter S
        • Oscadchy A
        • Hertz M
        Perforations of the rectosigmoid colon induced by cleansing enema: CT findings in 14 patients.
        Abdom Imaging. 2002; 27: 453-457
        • Yeung KW
        • Kuo YT
        • Huang CL
        • Wu DK
        • Liu GC
        Inflammatory/infectious diseases and neoplasm's of colon: evaluation with CT.
        Clin Imag. 1998; 22: 246-251