Advertisement

MR arthrography in chondromalacia patellae diagnosis on a low-field open magnet system

      Abstract

      Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy conventional MRI and MR arthrography (MRA) in the diagnosis of chondromalacia patella (CP) on a low-field open magnet system (LFOMS), correlated with arthroscopy. Subjects and methods: Forty-two patients (50 knees) with pain in the anterior part of the knee were prospectively examined with LFOMS, including T1-weighted, proton density-weighted and T2-weighted sequences. All were also examined T1-weighted MRI after intraarticular injection of dilue gadopentetate dimeglumine. Two observers, who reached a consensus interpretation, evaluated each imaging technique independently. Thirty-six of the 50 facets examined had chondromalacia shown by arthroscopy, which was used as the standard of reference. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each imaging technique in the diagnosis of each stage of CP were determined and compared by using the McNemar two-tailed analysis. Results: Arthroscopy showed that 16 facets were normal. Four (30%) of 13 grade 1 lesions were detected with T1. Four lesions (30%) with T2 and three lesions (23%) with proton-weighted images were detected. Seven (53%) of 13 grade 1 lesions were detected with MRA. Grade 2 abnormalities were diagnosed in two (33%) of six facets with proton density-weighted pulse sequences, two (33%) of six facets with T1-weighted pulse sequences, in three (50%) of six facets with T2-weighted pulse sequences, in five (83%) of six facets with MRA sequences. Grade 3 abnormalities were diagnosed in three (71%) of seven facets with proton density- and T1-weighted images, five (71%) of seven facets with T2-weighted pulse sequences, six (85%) of seven facets with MRA sequences. Grade 4 CP was detected with equal sensitivity with T1-, proton density- and T2-weighted pulse sequences, all showing seven (87%) of the eight lesions. MRA again showed these findings in all eight patients. All imaging techniques were insensitive to grade 1 lesions and highly sensitive to grade 4 lesion, so that no significant difference among the techniques could be shown. Conclusion: All imaging technique studied had high specificity and accuracy in the detection and grading of CP; however, MRA was more sensitive than T1-weighted and proton density-weighted MR imaging on a LFOMS. Although the arthrographic techniques were not significantly better than T2-weighted imaging, the number of false-positive diagnosis was greatest with T2-weighted MRI.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Insall JN
        Disorders of the patella.
        in: Insal JN Surgery of the knee. Churchill Livingstone, New York1984: 191-260
        • Bullough P
        • Goodfellow J
        The significance of the fine structure of articular cartilage.
        J Bone Jt Surg, Br. 1968; 50: 852-857
        • Goodfellow J
        • Hungerford DS
        • Woods C
        Patello-femoral joint mechanics and pathology: 2. Chondromalacia patellae.
        J Bone Jt Surg, Br. 1976; 58: 291-299
        • Hayes CW
        • Sawyer RW
        • Conway WF
        Patellar cartilage lesions: in vitro detection and staging with MR imaging and pathologic correlation.
        Radiology. 1990; 176: 479-483
        • McCauley TR
        • Kier R
        • Lynch KJ
        • Jokl P
        Chondromalacia patellae: diagnosis with MR imaging.
        AJR. 1992; 158: 101-105
        • Shahriaree H
        Chondromalacia.
        Contemp Orthop. 1985; 11: 27-39
        • Konig H
        • Sauter R
        • Deimling M
        • Vogt M
        Cartilage disorders: comparison of spin-echo, CHESS, and FLASH sequence MR images.
        Radiology. 1987; 164: 753-758
        • Speer KP
        • Spritzer CE
        • Goldner JL
        • Garrett WE
        Magnetic resonance imaging of traumatic knee articular cartilage injuries.
        Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19: 396-402
        • Heron CW
        • Calvert PT
        Three-dimensional gradient-echo MR imaging of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 100 patients.
        Radiology. 1992; 183: 839-844
        • Recht MP
        • Kramer J
        • Marcelis S
        • Pathria MN
        • Trudell D
        • Haghighi P
        • Sartoris DJ
        • Resnick D
        Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques.
        Radiology. 1993; 187 (May): 473-478
        • Rand T
        • Brossmann J
        • Pedowitz R
        • Ahn JM
        • Haghigi P
        • Resnick D
        Analysis of patellar cartilage. Comparison of conventional MR imaging and MR and CT arthrography in cadavers.
        Acta Radiol. 2000; 41: 492-497
        • Bredella MA
        • Losasso C
        • Moelleken SC
        • Huegli RW
        • Genant HK
        • Tirman PF
        Three-point Dixon chemical-shift imaging for evaluating articular cartilage defects in the knee joint on a low-field-strength open magnet.
        AJR. 2001; 177: 1371-1375
        • Johnson PH
        Chondromalacia patellae.
        J Ark Med Soc. 1979; 76 (Aug.): 142-147
        • Marar BC
        • Orth MC
        • Pillay VK
        Chondromalacia of the patella in Chinese. A postmortem study.
        J Bone Jt Surg, Am. 1975; 57 (Apr.): 342-345
        • Horus JW
        The diagnosis of chondromalacia by double contrast arthrography of the knee.
        J Bone Jt Surg, Am. 1977; 59: 119-120
        • Boven F
        • Bellamans MA
        • Geurts J
        • DeBoeck H
        • Potvilliege R
        The value of computed tomography scanning in chondromalacia patellae.
        Skelet Radiol. 1982; 8: 183-185
        • Boven F
        • Bellemans MA
        • Geurts J
        • De Boeck H
        • Potvliege R
        The value of computed tomography scanning in chondromalacia patellae.
        Skelet Radiol. 1982; 8: 183-185
        • Chandnani VP
        • Ho C
        • Chu P
        • Trudell D
        • Resnick D
        Knee hyaline cartilage evaluated with MR imaging: a cadaveric study involving multiple imaging sequences and intraarticular injection of gadolinium and saline solution.
        Radiology. 1991; 178 (Feb.): 557-561
        • Hayes CW
        • Conway WF
        • Walsh JW
        • Coppage L
        • Gervin AS
        Seat belt injuries: radiologic findings and clinical correlation.
        Radiographics. 1991; 11 (Jan.): 23-36
        • Yulish BS
        • Montanez J
        • Goodfellow DB
        • Bryan PJ
        • Mulopulos GP
        • Modic MT
        Chondromalacia patellae: assessment with MR imaging.
        Radiology. 1987; 164 (Sep.): 763-766
        • Handelberg F
        • Shahabpour M
        • Casteleyn PP
        Chondral lesions of the patella evaluated with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy.
        Arthroscopy. 1990; 6: 24-29
        • Ahn JM
        • Kwak SM
        • Kang HS
        • Muhle C
        • Pedowitz RA
        • Frank LR
        • Trudell D
        • Haghighi P
        • Resnick D
        Evaluation of patellar cartilage in cadavers with a low field strength extremity-only magnet: comparison of MR imaging sequences, with macroscopic findings as the standard.
        Radiology. 1998; 208: 57-62
        • Peterfy CG
        • Roberts T
        • Genant HK
        Dedicated extremity MR imaging: an emerging technology.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 1997; 35: 1-20
        • Zhang W
        • Goldhaber DM
        • Kramer DM
        Seperation of water and fat MR images in a single scan at .35 T using “sandwich” echoes.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996; 6: 909-917
        • Cotten A
        • Delfaut E
        • Demondion X
        • Lapegue F
        • Boukhelifa M
        • Boutry N
        • Chastanet P
        • Gougeon F
        MR imaging of the knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T: correlation with surgery.
        AJR. 2000; 174: 1093-1097
        • Woerthler K
        • Strothmann M
        • Tombach B
        • Reimer P
        Detection of articular cartilage lesions: experimental evaluation of low-and high-field-strength MR imaging at 0.18 and 1.0 T.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000; 11: 678-685