Research Article| Volume 26, ISSUE 1, P43-49, January 2002

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical practice

Application and interpretation of scans beyond the numbers


      Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely used for measurement of bone mineral density (BMD). In routine clinical practice, a diversity of DXA scan findings that deviate from anticipated anatomical landmarks and require a sophisticated approach to patient positioning and scan analysis may be identified. Recognition of various artifacts and pathologic processes that can falsely increase the measured BMD is essential to accurate DXA scan analysis. Critical evaluation of the DXA scan image, and careful appraisal of numeric data on the computer-generated printout by clinicians and radiology technologists are instrumental to ensure correct DXA scan interpretation. We demonstrate a spectrum of incidental findings that may influence BMD measurements and analyze common pitfalls of DXA scan interpretation. Radiographic correlation can help further evaluate a suspected abnormality displayed on the DXA image.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Clinical Imaging
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Consensus development conference: prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis.
        Am J Med. 1991; 90: 107-110
      2. Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis.
        Am J Med. 1993; 94: 646-650
        • Kanis J
        • Melton L
        • Christiansen C
        • Johnston C
        • Khaltaev N
        The diagnosis of osteoporosis.
        J Bone Miner Res. 1994; 9: 1137-1141
        • Marcus R
        • Feldman D
        • Kelsey J
        Osteoporosis. Academic Press, San Diego1996: 420-421
        • Chrischilles E
        • Butler C
        • Davis C
        • Wallace R
        A model of the lifetime osteoporosis impact.
        Arch Intern Med. 1991; 151: 2026-2032
        • Praemer A
        • Furner S
        • Rice D
        Musculoskeletal conditions in the United States. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Park Ridge, IL1992
        • US Congress Office of Technology Assessment
        Hip fracture outcomes in people age 50 and over: background paper. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC1994 (OTA-BP-H-120, 95 pp.)
        • US Congress Office of Technology Assessment
        Effectiveness and costs of osteoporosis screening and hormone replacement therapy: Vol II. Evidence on benefits, risks and costs. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC1995 (OTA-BP-H-144, August)
        • Kanis JA
        • Delmas P
        • Burckhardt P
        • Cooper C
        • Torgeson D
        Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis.
        Osteoporosis Int. 1997; 7: 390-406
        • Genant H
        • Engelke K
        • Fuerst T
        • Gluer C
        • Grampp S
        • Harris S
        • Jergas M
        • Lang T
        • Lu Y
        • Majumdar S
        • Mathur A
        • Takada M
        Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art.
        J Bone Miner Res. 1996; 11: 707-730
        • Genant HK
        • Grampp S
        • Gluer CC
        • Faulkner K
        • Jergas M
        • Engelke K
        • Hagiwara S
        • Van Kujik C
        Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
        J Bone Miner Res. 1994; 9: 1503-1514
        • Mazess R
        Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the management of bone disease.
        Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 1995; 6: 507-537
        • Cawkwell G
        Movement artifact and dual X-ray absorptiometry.
        J Clin Densitom. 1998; 1: 141-147
        • Staron RB
        • Greenspan R
        • Miller TT
        • Bilezikian JP
        • Shane E
        • Haramati N
        Computerized bone densitometric analysis: operator-dependent errors.
        Radiology. 1999; 211: 467-470
        • Ryan P
        • Evans P
        • Blake G
        • Fogelman I
        The effect of vertebral collapse on spinal bone mineral density measurements in osteoporosis.
        Bone Miner. 1992; 18: 267-272