<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/?rss=yes"><title>Clinical Imaging</title><description>Clinical Imaging RSS feed: Current Issue. 
 Clinical Imaging  provides comprehensive coverage of new technology, new applications, and important issues concerning all diagnostic 
imaging methods. Under the editorship of Joseph P. Whalen, M.D.,  Clinical Imaging  explores the relative merits of established 
and developing diagnostic imaging technology, with regard to cost effectiveness, safety, and propriety where specific disorders and physiological 
systems are concerned.
The journal publishes: 
 • Original articles – peer–reviewed reports of new clinical developments

 
 • "Radiology Pathology Conference" features – a brief clinical history with physical findings, followed by a discussion 
of the radiologic imagings with a detailed correlation of the pathological findings 
 • Review articles – an overview of 
a key topic, with an invited editorial on the same subject 
 • Case reports – limited to important new observations 
 • 
Abstracts – summaries of significant papers in related journals 
 • Book Reviews 
 From ultrasound to MRI,  Clinical 
Imaging  provides essential information for radiologists, radiology residents, and radiologic technologists.</description><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>0899-7071</prism:issn><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:publicationDate>July 2010</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110001257/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002630/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707108003689/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001144/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001752/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001764/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001703/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000446/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001727/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002277/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002320/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002629/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002307/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002289/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000835/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000884/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000896/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000823/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000872/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000847/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000859/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000860/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000926/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000938/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS089970711000094X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000951/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000963/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000975/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000987/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000999/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000902/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110001257/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Table of Contents</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110001257/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Table of Contents</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/S0899-7071(10)00125-7</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>i</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>ii</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002630/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Renal hemodynamic changes with aging: a preliminary study using CT perfusion in the healthy elderly</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002630/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: To investigate renal blood flow perfusion parameter changes associated with aging using multislice spiral computed tomography (CT).Methods: This prospective study was approved by the institute's ethics committee for clinical study and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Forty-two consecutive patients who underwent abdominal CT without obvious renal abnormality at plain scanning were enrolled in this study. The renal perfusion scan was carried out using 16-slice spiral CT. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to examine the correlation between perfusion parameter changes with aging.Results: In both the cortex and medulla, blood flow (BF) and blood volume (BV) were negatively correlated with age, while time-to-peak (TTP) value and mean transit time (MTT) showed a positive correlation with age. Changes in BF, TTP, and MTT were found to have a statistically significant correlation with age in both the cortex and medulla, while the correlation between BV and age showed no statistical significance.Conclusion: It is feasible to assess renal hemodynamics changes with aging in the elderly using the current clinically available CT perfusion imaging technology in vivo. It may be helpful in the management of aged patients to familiarize with the renal hemodynamics changes in clinical work-up.</description><dc:title>Renal hemodynamic changes with aging: a preliminary study using CT perfusion in the healthy elderly</dc:title><dc:creator>Hong Zhao, Jingshan Gong, Yan Wang, Zuoquan Zhang, Peixin Qin</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.06.031</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-11-09</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-11-09</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>247</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>250</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707108003689/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Coronary imaging of anomalous origins and aneurysms of the left coronary artery by multislice computed tomography</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707108003689/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: In this paper, we describe two cases of anomalous origin of the left coronary artery and two cases of aneurysm on the left coronary artery. Detailed three-dimensional images were acquired by the multislice computed tomography (MSCT) SOMATOM Sensation Cardiac 64 during clinical studies of cardiac diseases.</description><dc:title>Coronary imaging of anomalous origins and aneurysms of the left coronary artery by multislice computed tomography</dc:title><dc:creator>Sergio Castorina, Tonia Luca, Giovanna Privitera, Vincenzo Riccioli</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2008.11.028</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-04-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-04-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>251</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>254</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001144/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Determination of accurate stent graft configuration in abdominal aortic aneurysm using computed tomography: a preliminary study</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001144/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: An aortic stent graft is frequently used to cure an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). It is critical to accurately fit the size and shape of the stent graft to the target region on the aorta. Proper sizing and shaping require the measurement of the orthogonal diameter of the target region from medical images. The present study aimed to acquire an accurate three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the aorta to determine the shape of the cross-sectional area where the stent graft would be implanted. A conventional geometric-active contour model was enhanced to prevent blurring and to improve edge detection with high noise resistivity. After the segmentation of two-dimensional (2D) images using the model, a 3D-reconstructed configuration of the aorta was achieved using a surface-rendering technique. The model could segment several selected synthetic images more accurately than conventional methods. Also, a 3D-reconstructed configuration of the abdominal aorta could be achieved using boundary coordinates extracted from 2D image segmentation. This preliminary study indicates the utility of the approach in optimizing stent graft configuration for AAA patients, thus enhancing stent graft healing.</description><dc:title>Determination of accurate stent graft configuration in abdominal aortic aneurysm using computed tomography: a preliminary study</dc:title><dc:creator>Ho Chul Kim, Sang Woo Park, Kyoung Won Nam, Hyuk Choi, Eun Jeong Choi, Seungoh Jin, Min Gi Kim, Kyung Sun</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.06.023</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-07-23</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-07-23</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>255</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>262</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001752/abstract?rss=yes"><title>CT-guided liver biopsy: correlation of procedure time and radiation dose with patient size, weight, and lesion volume and depth</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001752/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the effect of various factors, including overall patient size, weight, and individual lesion characteristics, on the radiation dose and procedure time required to successfully perform computed tomography (CT)-guided liver lesion biopsies.Materials and Methods: This Institutional-Review-Board-approved study included 209 patients (average age, 59 years; range, 19–86 years; 105 males, 104 females) who underwent CT-guided liver lesion biopsy on a four-slice multidetector row CT scanner (LightSpeed Qx/i; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). Medical records and images were retrospectively reviewed to obtain the following data: (a) patient weight, (b) patient size, (c) lesion volume, (d) lesion depth, (e) CT dose index (CTDI) and effective radiation dose, and (f) procedure time. Statistical analysis was performed with multiple linear regression to assess the effect of various parameters on radiation dose and procedure time.Results: CTDI was significantly correlated with patient weight (P&lt;.01), size (P=.03), and lesion volume (P&lt;.01). The total effective radiation dose was significantly correlated with patient size (P&lt;.01) and lesion depth (P&lt;.01). Total procedure time was significantly correlated with lesion volume (P&lt;.01) and depth (P&lt;.01). There was a positive correlation between procedure time and effective radiation dose (r2=.57).Conclusion: In the current study, CT-guided liver lesion biopsy patient radiation dose was associated with both overall patient-specific features (weight and size) and specific lesion characteristics; however, the procedure duration was determined by lesion characteristics (lesion volume and depth) alone.</description><dc:title>CT-guided liver biopsy: correlation of procedure time and radiation dose with patient size, weight, and lesion volume and depth</dc:title><dc:creator>Jianhai Li, Unni K. Udayasankar, John Carew, William C. Small</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.06.029</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-14</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-14</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>263</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>268</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001764/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the subscapularis muscle after arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001764/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: To evaluate the subscapularis muscle (SSC) after arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization, three groups [after arthroscopic (A), after open shoulder stabilization (B), healthy volunteers (0)] underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic resonance parameters were compared with clinical SSC tests and shoulder scores. From Group 0 to B, the diameters of the SSC decreased, and the fatty degeneration of the upper SSC increased (P .05). Magnetic resonance analysis provides reasons of postoperative SSC dysfunction.</description><dc:title>Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the subscapularis muscle after arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization</dc:title><dc:creator>Constanze Nikulka, Anton Goldmann, Ralf-Juergen Schroeder</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.06.030</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-24</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-24</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>269</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>276</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001703/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Pictorial essay: multimodality imaging of metastases from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001703/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Surgical resection is the only curative therapy available for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Unfortunately, metastatic disease constitutes an absolute contraindication for surgery. Therefore, the detection of metastatic disease is a critical component of preoperative imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are currently used for the preoperative evaluation of these patients. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and ultrasonography may also be helpful in the detection of metastatic disease. This pictorial essay reviews the imaging findings of common and uncommon metastases from pancreatic adenocarcinoma.</description><dc:title>Pictorial essay: multimodality imaging of metastases from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma</dc:title><dc:creator>Efe Ozkan, Aparna Balachandran, Priya R. Bhosale, Eric P. Tamm, Leonardo P. Marcal, Janio Szklaruk</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.06.026</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-17</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-17</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>277</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>287</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000446/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Preparation and characterization of a nanoscale ultrasound contrast agent</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000446/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Objective: The purpose of the present study is to prepare a nanoscale ultrasound contrast agent and to investigate its characterization and ultrasonic imaging in vivo.Methods: Nanoscale ultrasound contrast agent was prepared by machine vibration and low speed centrifugation, and the appearance, distribution, diameter, and zeta potential of the nanoscale ultrasound contrast agent were measured. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was performed on normal rabbit liver to observe the duration and intensity of enhancement.Results: The nanoscale ultrasound contrast agent had a good shape and uniform distribution by light microscope and transmission electron microscope, with average diameters of 623.4 nm and average zeta potential of 1.3 mV. The contrast imaging study in vivo showed that the nanoscale ultrasound contrast agent could significantly enhance the duration and echo intensity of the vessels and parenchyma in rabbit livers, and there were no obvious difference with micro-scale microbubbles.Conclusions: The nanoscale ultrasound contrast agent is stable and effective for the enhancement of ultrasound imaging. This study provides an important platform for miniaturizing and improving the targeting performance of ultrasound contrast agents.</description><dc:title>Preparation and characterization of a nanoscale ultrasound contrast agent</dc:title><dc:creator>Dong Wang, Ke Yang, Yun-Hua Gao, Kai-Bin Tan, Zheng Liu</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.02.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-17</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-17</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Original Articles</prism:section><prism:startingPage>288</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>292</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001727/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Burn injury by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109001727/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging has become a standard diagnostic procedure in clinical medicine and is well known to have hazards for patients with pacemaker or metallic foreign bodies. Compared to CT, the frequency of MRI examinations is increasing due to the missing exposure of the patients by X-rays. Furthermore, high-field magnetic resonance tomograph (MRT) with 3 T has entered clinical practice, and 7-T systems are installed in multiple scientific institutions. On the other hand, the possibility of burn injuries has been reported only in very few cases.Based on a clinical finding of a burn injury in a 31-year-old male patient during a routine MRI of the lumbar spine with standard protocol, the MR scanner was checked and the examination was simulated in an animal model.The patient received a third-degree burn injury of the skin of the right hand and pelvis in a small region of skin contact. The subsequent control of the MRI scanner indicated no abnormal values for radiofrequency (RF) and power. In the subsequent animal experiment, comparable injuries could only be obtained by high RF power in a microwave stove.It is concluded that ‘tissue loops’ resulting from a contact between hand and pelvis must be avoided. With regard to forensic aspects, the need to inform patients of such a minimal risk can be avoided if the patients are adequately positioned using an isolating material between the hands and pelvis. These facts must be emphasized more in the future, if high-field MRI with stronger RF gradients is available in routine imaging.</description><dc:title>Burn injury by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging</dc:title><dc:creator>Ernst G. Eising, Justin Hughes, Frank Nolte, Walter Jentzen, Andreas Bockisch</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.06.025</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-08-28</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-08-28</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section><prism:startingPage>293</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>297</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002277/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression facilitates detection and evaluation of an anterior rib contusion</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002277/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: We report the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in a 29-year-old woman with anterior chest wall pain following blunt trauma, with special emphasis on the value of diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS). Although a rib contusion could be depicted at (fat-suppressed) T2-weighted MRI, anatomical localization and assessment of lesion extent were superior and more straightforward at DWIBS. Thus, this report shows the utility of adding DWIBS to an MRI protocol for anterior chest wall evaluation.</description><dc:title>Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression facilitates detection and evaluation of an anterior rib contusion</dc:title><dc:creator>Thomas C. Kwee, Taro Takahara, Tetsu Niwa</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.07.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-10-09</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-10-09</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section><prism:startingPage>298</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>301</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002320/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Multimodality imaging of a neonatal wandering spleen</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002320/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Wandering spleen, a rare entity, is caused by the absence or laxity of the normal anchoring splenic ligaments. Only three neonatal cases have been reported in the English-language literature. We present the clinical and multimodality imaging findings of a newborn with laceration and hemorrhage of a wandering spleen. The course was complicated by the concurrent diagnosis of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, which confused the clinical picture when a falling hematocrit raised the question of rebleeding several days after presentation.</description><dc:title>Multimodality imaging of a neonatal wandering spleen</dc:title><dc:creator>Elizabeth Kagan Arleo, Arzu Kovanlikaya, Kevin Mennitt, Suchitra Acharya, Paula W. Brill</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.09.001</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-09-25</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-09-25</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section><prism:startingPage>302</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>305</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002629/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Two rare cases of spontaneous splenic rupture</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002629/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The rupture of the spleen, not secondary to external trauma, is rare. Two cases are reported. The first case occurred in a patient with an aggressive form of lymphoma, and the second in a patient following a colonoscopy. In the rare occurrences of spontaneous rupture, radiological imaging, in particular by computed tomography, will lead to the diagnosis and help in deciding the correct treatment.</description><dc:title>Two rare cases of spontaneous splenic rupture</dc:title><dc:creator>Anja Randriamarolahy, Jean Michel Cucchi, Philippe Brunner, Georges Garnier, Jean-François Demarquay, Jean Noël Bruneton</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.09.004</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-01-04</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-01-04</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section><prism:startingPage>306</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>308</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002307/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Imaging manifestations of malignant neoplasia mimicking pyogenic osteodiscitis</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002307/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: Malignant neoplasia involving contiguous vertebrae and the corresponding intervertebral discs is a rare occurrence that has similar imaging manifestations as pyogenic osteodiscitis. The authors describe the imaging manifestations of two cases of malignant neoplasia mimicking pyogenic osteodiscitis. We present a case of an 83-year-old male with metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma and an 82-year-old female with a plasmacytoma, both within the thoracic spine. These cases illustrate how the imaging features of pyogenic osteodiscitis may parallel those of malignant neoplasia.</description><dc:title>Imaging manifestations of malignant neoplasia mimicking pyogenic osteodiscitis</dc:title><dc:creator>Michael John Gabe, Andrew M. Allmendinger, Alan Krauthamer, Vadim Spektor, Sylvie Destian, Bruce Zablow</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.08.028</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-10-05</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-10-05</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section><prism:startingPage>309</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>315</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002289/abstract?rss=yes"><title>X-ray appearance of subcutaneous gemstones as part of alternative/holistic medicine: a case report and review of the literature</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707109002289/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: The authors present a case of a deceased man with numerous subcutaneous nodules identified as foreign bodies on radiographic films. The foreign bodies were gemstones inserted underneath the skin as a form of holistic medicine. The X-ray findings of this case and a review of the literature for similar subcutaneously implanted foreign bodies used in holistic, alternative, or folk medicine are presented.</description><dc:title>X-ray appearance of subcutaneous gemstones as part of alternative/holistic medicine: a case report and review of the literature</dc:title><dc:creator>Jerri McLemore, Aaron L. Hallengren</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.08.026</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2009-10-26</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2009-10-26</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section><prism:startingPage>316</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>318</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000835/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Case reports</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000835/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Case reports</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-06-04</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-06-04</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Case Reports</prism:section><prism:startingPage>319</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>319</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000884/abstract?rss=yes"><title></title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000884/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>With the advances in technology, sophisticated cross-sectional imaging techniques play a major role in the evaluation of pediatric cardiovascular diseases. However, plain films are still essential in the initial presentation and the follow up of these patients after corrective surgery. This book, authored by Drs. Yoo, MacDonald, and Babyn, provides a systematic approach to the interpretation of plain films in pediatric cardiac patients. It contains three main sections. The first section “Getting Started” covers the normal cardiovascular anatomy, a sequential segmental approach to congenital heart diseases and current surgical procedures with outstanding illustrations which are also accompanied by morphological photographs and state of the art cross sectional magnetic resonance images. There is also a chapter on how to obtain best chest radiographs with an emphasis on radiation protection.</description><dc:title></dc:title><dc:creator>Arzu Kovanlikaya</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.011</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-05-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-05-31</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section><prism:startingPage>320</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>320</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000896/abstract?rss=yes"><title></title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000896/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The book is primarily aimed at the cardiologists and radiologists, both in training and in practice. However, it will also be useful for cardiac surgeons and general practitioners as a reference text. The contributing authors represent a multidisciplinary group including cardiologists and radiologists. As the title suggests, the book reviews the various imaging modalities for diagnostic assessment of cardiovascular diseases with particular emphasis on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. It elegantly combines the clinical aspects of cardiovascular disease with state of the art radiological methods of investigating them.</description><dc:title></dc:title><dc:creator>Aamer Chugtal</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.012</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-05-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-05-31</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section><prism:startingPage>320</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>321</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000823/abstract?rss=yes"><title></title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000823/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The title “Novel Techniques for Imaging the Heart: Cardiac MR and CT” belies the wealth of information in this book. Beyond the expected descriptions of cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography, chapters on evaluation of various types of patients, risk assessment for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, risks to patients with implanted devices, radiation dosage, and adverse reactions to contrast agents provide useful information for a variety of clinicians.</description><dc:title></dc:title><dc:creator>Patricia J. Numann</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-05-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-05-31</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section><prism:startingPage>321</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>321</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000872/abstract?rss=yes"><title></title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000872/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This treatise, in its second edition, will be welcomed by the gastrointestinal radiologist who has already enjoyed it in the earlier edition. The text has been enriched by new material, 150 new diagnoses, by new illustrations, many in color. The bulleted format has been kept and numerous, up-to-date references can be noted at the end of the discussion of each diagnosis.</description><dc:title></dc:title><dc:creator>Antonio F. Govoni</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.010</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-05-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-05-31</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section><prism:startingPage>321</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>322</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000847/abstract?rss=yes"><title></title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000847/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Catherine Westbrook, with the help of John Talbot, has written a well-presented and easy-to-use book, which provides a step-by-step approach to the current status of MR imaging physics. The book is well-organized with 62 chapters. This second edition has been fully revised and updated with brand new information on data acquisition and pulse sequences. Each topic is presented as a double-page spread with key facts accompanied by clear diagrams encapsulating essential knowledge so that main points can be easily seen. The beautiful color diagrams made by John Talbot, admirably enhance the text and work as helpful adjuncts to better understand some complex concepts.</description><dc:title></dc:title><dc:creator>Philippe Soyer</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-05-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-05-31</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section><prism:startingPage>322</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>322</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000859/abstract?rss=yes"><title></title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000859/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This book of just 256 pages is excellent. It is divided into four large chapters: Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies, Ultrasound-Guided Access and Drainage, Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Therapy, and Sonohysterography, and is subdivided into 23 sections.</description><dc:title></dc:title><dc:creator>Jean Noël Bruneton</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.008</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-05-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-05-31</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section><prism:startingPage>322</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>323</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000860/abstract?rss=yes"><title></title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000860/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This pocket atlas saw its light in a first German Edition in 1995. Since that time there have been editions in English [this is the 2nd], Japanese, Spanish, French, Russian and Bulgarian. From the first edition, enlarged are the sections on mammography, on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); added were more drawings, and the text was also enriched.</description><dc:title></dc:title><dc:creator>Antonio F. Govoni</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-05-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-05-31</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Book Reviews</prism:section><prism:startingPage>323</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>323</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000926/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Value of whole-body CTA in the management of brain-dead patients [in French]</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000926/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>To assess the value of whole body computed tomographic angiography (CTA), as a complement to head CTA, in the management of brain-dead patients as potential organ donors.   A total of 27 consecutive brain-dead patients admitted in a center authorized in the harvesting of organs between October 2006 and January 2008 were included. The imaging protocol used was the protocol recommended by the French Society of Neuroradiology, with additional arterial phase helical acquisition of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, and parenchymal phase helical acquisition of the abdomen and pelvis. The imaging findings were then correlated to the surgical reports after organ harvesting.</description><dc:title>Value of whole-body CTA in the management of brain-dead patients [in French]</dc:title><dc:creator>A. Fregeville, C. de Bazelaire, A.M. Zagdanski, M. Albiter, F. Desgrandchamps, E. de Kerviler</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.015</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Abstracts</prism:section><prism:startingPage>324</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>324</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000938/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesion evaluation</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000938/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The purpose of this study was to investigate the ability of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the detection and characterisation of breast lesions.</description><dc:title>Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesion evaluation</dc:title><dc:creator>P. Belli, M. Costantini, E. Buffi, A. Magistrelli, G. La Torre, L. Bonomo</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.016</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Abstracts</prism:section><prism:startingPage>324</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>324</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS089970711000094X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Inflammatory breast cancer: MR imaging findings</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS089970711000094X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>This paper describes the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features of primary inflammatory breast cancer (IBC).   Two radiologists reviewed the MR examinations of 14 women with a pathological diagnosis of IBC. Images were assessed for skin thickening, oedema, nipple retraction, architectural distortion, type and extent of parenchymal and cutaneous enhancement and enhancement kinetics over time, axillary and internal mammary lymphadenopathy, pectoral muscle enhancement, and additional findings.</description><dc:title>Inflammatory breast cancer: MR imaging findings</dc:title><dc:creator>G. Carbognin, C. Calciolari, V. Girardi, L. Camera, G. Pollini, R. Pozzi Mucelli</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.017</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Abstracts</prism:section><prism:startingPage>324</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>324</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000951/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Difffusion-weighted MR imaging of liver pathology: principles and clinical applications [in French]</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000951/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Due to ongoing technological advances, the range of clinical applications for diffusion-weighted MR imaging has expanded to now include abdominal pathology. Current applications for liver pathology include two main directions. First, oncologic imaging, with detection; characterization and follow-up of lesions. Second, evaluation of diffuse liver diseases, including hepatic fibrosis. The diagnostic impact and role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging remain under investigation, but appear promising. Because of its short acquisition time, sensitivity, and additional information it provides, diffusion-weighted MR imaging should be included in routine liver imaging protocols.</description><dc:title>Difffusion-weighted MR imaging of liver pathology: principles and clinical applications [in French]</dc:title><dc:creator>M. Lewin, L. Arrivé, C. Lacombe, A. Vignaud, L. Azizi, M. Raynal, N. Jomaah, L. Monnier-Cholley, J.M. Tubiana, Y. Menu</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.018</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Abstracts</prism:section><prism:startingPage>324</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>325</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000963/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Mature and immature ovarian teratomas: US, CT and MR imaging features [in French]</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000963/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Mature cystic ovarian teratomas, also called dermoid cysts, are one of the most frequent ovarian tumors of younger female patients and are suggested when a fat-containing cystic tumor is identified on imaging. However, the presence of fat is not pathognomonic for dermoid cyst, and it may also be identified in immature teratomas, whose prognosis and treatment are different. Some imaging features are helpful to differentiate between both, rumors, including the presence of enhancement on CT and MRI. Knowledge of the imaging features of these tumors allows for a confident diagnosis to be made in most cases. A few rate and less typical imaging features should also be recognized.</description><dc:title>Mature and immature ovarian teratomas: US, CT and MR imaging features [in French]</dc:title><dc:creator>B. Damarey, M.O. Farine, D. Vinatier, P. Collinet, J.P. Lucot, O. Kerdraon, E. Poncelet</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.019</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Abstracts</prism:section><prism:startingPage>325</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>325</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000975/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Clinical feasibility of a magnetic resonance tracking system to guide the position of the scan plane during physiologic joint motion</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000975/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Unrestricted physiologic joint motion results in multidirectional displacement of the anatomic structures. When performing real-time magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of such a joint motion, continuous adjustment of the scan plane position may be required. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of a method to guide the scan plane position during dynamic-motion MR imaging of freely moving joints.</description><dc:title>Clinical feasibility of a magnetic resonance tracking system to guide the position of the scan plane during physiologic joint motion</dc:title><dc:creator>J. Vandevenne, A. Pearle, P. Lang, K. Butts Pauly, G. Bergman</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.020</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Abstracts</prism:section><prism:startingPage>325</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>325</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000987/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Imaging of giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000987/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Giant cell tumours of the tendon sheath (GCTTS) and pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) are part of a spectrum of benign proliferative lesions of synovial origin that may affect the joints, bursae, and tendon sheaths. This review article describes the clinicopathological features and imaging findings in patients with GCTTS. GCTTS usually presents as a soft tissue mass with pressure erosion of the underlying bone. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of GCTTS typically shows low to intermediate signal on T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences due to the presence of haemosiderin, which exerts a paramagnetic effect. On gradient-echo sequences, the paramagnetic effect of haemosiderin is further exaggerated, resulting in areas of very low signal due to the blooming artefact. Ultrasonography shows a soft mass related to the tendon sheath that is hypervascular on colour or power Doppler imaging.</description><dc:title>Imaging of giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath</dc:title><dc:creator>J.M.C. Wan, N. Magarelli, W.C.G. Pen, G. Guglielmi, T.W.H. Shek</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.021</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Abstracts</prism:section><prism:startingPage>325</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>325</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000999/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Computed tomography and thymoma: distinctive findings in invasive and noninvasive thymoma and predictive features of recurrence</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000999/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Our goal was to assess the computed tomography (CT) imaging findings of thymoma and to correlate these features with Masaoka staging system and prognosis.   CT findings of thymoma were analysed in 58 patients who had undergone surgery between January 2002 and September 2007. All cases were classified according to the Masaoka staging system. The presence of various CT findings was correlated with tumour invasiveness and recurrence. In statistical analysis, P&lt;.05 was interpreted as significant.</description><dc:title>Computed tomography and thymoma: distinctive findings in invasive and noninvasive thymoma and predictive features of recurrence</dc:title><dc:creator>A.M. Priola, S.M. Priola, M. Di Franco, A. Cataldi, S. Durando, C. Fava</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.022</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-07-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-07-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Abstracts</prism:section><prism:startingPage>325</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>325</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000902/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Meetings and courses</title><link>http://www.clinicalimaging.org/article/PIIS0899707110000902/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Meetings and courses</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.04.013</dc:identifier><dc:source>Clinical Imaging 34, 4 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-05-31</dc:date><prism:publicationName>Clinical Imaging</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-05-31</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>34</prism:volume><prism:number>4</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S0899-7071(10)X0004-3</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section></prism:section><prism:startingPage>326</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>326</prism:endingPage></item></rdf:RDF>