Clinical Imaging
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 228-231, May 2011

Siliconomas mimicking cancer

  • Ahuva Grubstein

      Affiliations

    • Mammography Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Radiology Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petach Tikva 49100, Israel. Tel.: +972 3 937 6343; fax: +972 3 937 6335.
  • ,
  • Maya Cohen

      Affiliations

    • Mammography Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel
  • ,
  • Adam Steinmetz

      Affiliations

    • Nuclear Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Kaplan 1 St., Petach Tikva 49100, Israel
  • ,
  • David Cohen

      Affiliations

    • Pathology Department, Herzelia Medical Center, Herzliya, Israel

Received 1 March 2010; accepted 10 April 2010. published online 01 September 2010.

Abstract 

Introduction

Silicone breast implants are widely used for breast augmentation and breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Implant rupture has specific radiological signs. With the advent use of new imaging technique such as positron emission tomography (PET) computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast, these signs may simulate malignancy.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed four cases of patients with silicon breast implants who arrive to the mammography clinic for further evaluation of a suspected malignant process demonstrated on either PET CT or breast MRI.

Results

Two cases were of PET CT performed for routine oncology follow-up of breast cancer. On both, the PET CT demonstrated multiple-spread benign silicone granulomas manifesting as multiple masses having an increase fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake. One case of a new mass was demonstrated as a suspicious mass on the dynamic sequences on MRI of the breast. Ultrasound-guided biopsy demonstrated benign tissue response to silicone. One case demonstrated bilateral ruptured breast implants on breast MRI, as well as bilateral axillary and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Eventually, the patient underwent bronchoscopy for pulmonary workup of dry cough, revealing sarcoidosis.

Conclusion

Silicone granulomas can manifest as masses with suspicious morphology and enhancement dynamics on breast MRI or with increased FDG uptake on PET CT. The presence of silicone implants and awareness of the possibility of a rupture and formation of silicone granulomas may help in facilitating a correct diagnosis.

Keywords: Siliconoma, PET CT, Breast MRI

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0899-7071(10)00152-X

doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.07.006

Clinical Imaging
Volume 35, Issue 3 , Pages 228-231, May 2011