Clinical Imaging
Volume 34, Issue 6 , Pages 418-424 , November 2010

CAD in full-field digital mammography—influence of reader experience and application of CAD on interpretation of time

  • Christian Sohns

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology and Pneumology/Heart Center, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
    • ,
  • Besim Cetin Angic

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
    • ,
  • Samuel Sossalla

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology and Pneumology/Heart Center, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
    • ,
  • Frank Konietschke

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Statistics, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany
    • ,
  • Silvia Obenauer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiology, UMG, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099 Göttingen, Germany. Tel.: +49 0551 398965.

Received 28 August 2009 ,Accepted 8 October 2009.

References 

  1. Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. Clinical practice: mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1672–1680
  2. United States Preventive Services Task Force . Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:344–346
  3. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology. 1992;184:613–617
  4. Goergen SK, Evans J, Cohen GP, MacMillan JH. Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. Radiology. 1997;204:131–135
  5. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology. 2000;215:554–562
  6. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed carcinomas later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology. 2000;219:192–202
  7. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, et al. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multi-institutional trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:687–693
  8. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology. 2001;220:781–786
  9. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:185–190
  10. Birdwell RL, Bandodkar P, Ikeda DM. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology. 2005;236:451–457
  11. Astley SM. Evaluation of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompting techniques for mammography. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:20–25
  12. Vyborny CJ. Can computers help radiologists read mammograms?. Radiology. 1994;191:315–317
  13. Doi K, MacMahon H, Katsuragawa S, Nishikawa RM, Jiang Y. Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls. Eur Radiol. 1999;31:97–109
  14. Funovics M, Schamp S, Helbich TH, Lackner B, Wunderbaldinger P, Fuchsjäger M, et al. Evaluation of a computer-assisted diagnosis system in breast carcinoma. Röfo. 2001;173:218–223
  15. Muller S. Full field digital mammography designed as a complete system. Eur Radiol. 1999;31:25–34
  16. Bick U. Full-field digital mammography. Röfo. 2000;173:957–964
  17. Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Munzel U, Baum F, Grabbe E. Screen-film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1697–1702
  18. Baum F, Fischer U, Obenauer S, Grabbe E. Computer-aided detection in direct digital full-field mammography: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:3015–3017
  19. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Yaffe MJ, et al. American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology. 2005;236:404–412
  20. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773–1783
  21. Obenauer S, Sohns C, Werner C, Grabbe E. Retrospektive Analyse eines computerassistierten Detektions-Systems (CAD) in der digitalen Vollfeldmammographie in Abhängigkeit von der Histologie. Rofo. 2005;177:1103–1109
  22. Shapiro S, Strax P, Venet L. Periodic breast cancer screening in reducing mortality from breast cancer. JAMA. 1971;215:1777–1785
  23. Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, Baldetorp I, Holmberg LH, Grontoft O, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Lancet. 1985;2:829–832
  24. Quek ST, Thng CH, Khoo JB, Koh WL. Radiologists' detection of mammographic abnormalities with and without a computer-aided detection system. Australas Radiol. 2003;47:257–260
  25. Cupples TE. Impact of computer-aided detection (CAD) in a regional screening mammography program. Radiology. 2001;221:221–520
  26. Bandodkar P, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM. Computer aided detection (CAD) with screening mammography in an academic institution: preliminary findings. Radiology. 2002;202:225–458
  27. Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AA. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology. 1994;191:241–244
  28. Obenauer S, Sohns C, Werner C, Grabbe E. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories. Breast J. 2006;12:16–19
  29. Castellino RA, Roehring JR. The promise of computer aided detection in digital mammography. Eur Radiol. 1999;31:35–39
  30. Malich A, Sauner D, Marx C, Facius M, Boehm T, Pfleiderer SO, et al. Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection Rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology. 2003;228:851–856
  31. Baines CJ, Miller AB, Wall C, McFarlande DV, Simor IS, Jong R, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in the Canadian national breast screen study: a preliminary report from five centers. Radiology. 1986;160:295–298
  32. Elter M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Wittenberg T. The prediction of breast cancer biopsy outcomes using two CAD approaches that both emphasize an intelligible decision process. Med Phys. 2007;23:4164–4172

PII: S0899-7071(09)00315-5

doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.10.039

Clinical Imaging
Volume 34, Issue 6 , Pages 418-424 , November 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution