Clinical Imaging
Volume 34, Issue 6 , Pages 418-424, November 2010

CAD in full-field digital mammography—influence of reader experience and application of CAD on interpretation of time

  • Christian Sohns

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology and Pneumology/Heart Center, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
  • ,
  • Besim Cetin Angic

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
  • ,
  • Samuel Sossalla

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology and Pneumology/Heart Center, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
  • ,
  • Frank Konietschke

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Statistics, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany
  • ,
  • Silvia Obenauer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiology, UMG, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099 Göttingen, Germany. Tel.: +49 0551 398965.

Received 28 August 2009; accepted 8 October 2009. published online 11 March 2010.

Abstract 

Aim

To assess time expenditure using the influence of computer-assisted detection (CAD) system in the interpretation of the dependence of early research and benign and malignant mammograms on readers' experience.

Materials and Methods

CAD (Image Checker V2.3; R2 Technology, Los Altos, CA, USA) was prospectively applied on digital mammograms of 303 patients [early research (n=103), benign (n=102), and malignant group (n=98)]. Mammograms were analyzed by three readers with varying experience in evaluating mammograms (medical student, resident and attending) according to the BI-RADS classification. Time was stopped and recorded. All images were presented randomly with and without the influence of CAD and from the different patient groups. To evaluate the statistical significance, the corresponding P value for time to read the mammograms in addition to different patient groups, application of CAD, readers' experience, and interaction of reader was calculated.

Results

The attending needs, independent of CAD application, the least time, followed by the medical assistant and the student. In all three patient groups, CAD adoption elongates reading time of the student and the resident. The medical specialist needs with and without CAD median the same time. In the early research group, no significant differences were registered (P=.1343). Concerning readers' experience, there is an explicit significant difference (P<.0001). The application of CAD correlates with the corresponding readers' experience and also provides a not significant result. In comparison, the P value for the malignant and benign groups shows significant interactions between the readers' experiences as well as CAD application.

Conclusion

The future role of CAD application depends on whether sensitivity can be increased and time expenditure caused by false-positive marks can be decreased. In the future, second reading could be substituted by a CAD system if the reader has a wide professional experience.

Keywords: CAD, Digital mammography, Time expenditure

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0899-7071(09)00315-5

doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.10.039

Clinical Imaging
Volume 34, Issue 6 , Pages 418-424, November 2010