Clinical Imaging
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 1-9, January 2011

CT evaluation of pulmonary venous anatomy variation in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

  • Chandani Thorning

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Praed Street, W2 1NY London, UK. Tel.: +44 207 886 2041.
  • ,
  • Mohamad Hamady

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  • ,
  • Jonathan Voon Ping Liaw

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  • ,
  • Christoph Juli

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  • ,
  • Phang Boon Lim

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  • ,
  • Ranju Dhawan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  • ,
  • Nicholas S. Peters

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  • ,
  • D. Wyn Davies

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  • ,
  • Prapa Kanagaratnam

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  • ,
  • Mark D. O'Neill

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  • ,
  • Andrew R. Wright

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Received 2 September 2009; accepted 10 November 2009. published online 11 January 2010.

Abstract 

To characterize pulmonary vein (PV) anatomy and the relative position of the PV ostia to the adjacent thoracic vertebral bodies, two readers reviewed 176 computed tomography pulmonary venous studies. PV ostial dimensions were measured and PV ovality assessed. Anatomical variations in PV drainage were noted. The position of the PV ostium relative to the nearest vertebral body edge was recorded. Right PV ostia were significantly more circular than the left (p<.001). Anatomical variability was greater for right PVs: 82% of patients had 2 ostia, 17% had 3 ostia, 0.5% had 4 ostia and 0.5% a common ostium. For left PVs, 91% of patients had 2 ostia, 8.5% a common ostium and 0.5% 3 ostia. Mean ostial distances from vertebral margin were: right PVs 3.62±7.48 mm; left PVs 3.84±8.46 mm (p=.72). 65% of right upper PV, 60.5% of right lower PV, 51% of left upper PV and 57% of left lower PV ostia were positioned lateral to vertebral bodies. Right PV ostia are rounder than left-sided and right PV drainage is more variable. As a significant proportion of PV ostia overlap the vertebral bodies, prior anatomical evaluation by CT can assist catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation (AF), especially when performed under fluoroscopy.

Keywords: Computed tomography, Pulmonary veins, Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0899-7071(09)00310-6

doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.11.005

Clinical Imaging
Volume 35, Issue 1 , Pages 1-9, January 2011