Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages 293-297 (July 2010)


View previous. 9 of 31 View next.

Burn injury by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging

Ernst G. EisingaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Justin Hughesb, Frank Nolteb, Walter Jentzena, Andreas Bockischa

Received 1 May 2009; accepted 25 June 2009. published online 28 August 2009.

Abstract 

Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging has become a standard diagnostic procedure in clinical medicine and is well known to have hazards for patients with pacemaker or metallic foreign bodies. Compared to CT, the frequency of MRI examinations is increasing due to the missing exposure of the patients by X-rays. Furthermore, high-field magnetic resonance tomograph (MRT) with 3 T has entered clinical practice, and 7-T systems are installed in multiple scientific institutions. On the other hand, the possibility of burn injuries has been reported only in very few cases.

Based on a clinical finding of a burn injury in a 31-year-old male patient during a routine MRI of the lumbar spine with standard protocol, the MR scanner was checked and the examination was simulated in an animal model.

The patient received a third-degree burn injury of the skin of the right hand and pelvis in a small region of skin contact. The subsequent control of the MRI scanner indicated no abnormal values for radiofrequency (RF) and power. In the subsequent animal experiment, comparable injuries could only be obtained by high RF power in a microwave stove.

It is concluded that ‘tissue loops’ resulting from a contact between hand and pelvis must be avoided. With regard to forensic aspects, the need to inform patients of such a minimal risk can be avoided if the patients are adequately positioned using an isolating material between the hands and pelvis. These facts must be emphasized more in the future, if high-field MRI with stronger RF gradients is available in routine imaging.

a Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg/Essen, Germany

b Attorney Office Chambers, RWP Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Elper Weg 66, D-45657 Recklinghausen, Germany.

PII: S0899-7071(09)00172-7

doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2009.06.025


View previous. 9 of 31 View next.

Advertisement